Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	 Ruslan Kabatsayev <b7.10110111@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improve ptrace-error detection on Linux targets
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e6nsw8h.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ca41b317-cf1c-dfde-9f54-f990acf19dc5@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:45:37 +0100")

On Friday, August 30 2019, Pedro Alves wrote:

> On 8/29/19 8:27 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 29 2019, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
>>>> diff --git a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
>>>> index fd2f12a342..04ada53bf6 100644
>>>> --- a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
>>>> +++ b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
>>>> @@ -176,13 +176,26 @@ struct buffer;
>>>>  # define TRAP_HWBKPT 4
>>>>  #endif
>>>>  
>>>> -extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid);
>>>> +/* Find all possible reasons we could fail to attach PID and return
>>>> +   these as a string.  An empty string is returned if we didn't find
>>>> +   any reason.  If ERR is EACCES or EPERM, we also add a warning about
>>>> +   possible restrictions to use ptrace.  */
>>>> +extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err = -1);
>>>
>>> If ERR is an errno number, then it's a bit odd to use -1 for default,
>>> since errno == 0 is the traditional "no error" number.  Pedantically, I believe
>>> there's no garantee that a valid error number must be a positive integer.
>>>
>>> But, why the default argument in the first place?  What calls this
>>> without passing an error?
>> 
>> So, the only place that calls linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason without
>> passing the ERR argument is linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string:
>> 
>>   std::string
>>   linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid_t ptid, int err)
>>   {
>>     long lwpid = ptid.lwp ();
>>     std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (lwpid);
>> 
>>     if (!reason.empty ())
>>       return string_printf ("%s (%d), %s", safe_strerror (err), err,
>>                             reason.c_str ());
>>     else
>>       return string_printf ("%s (%d)", safe_strerror (err), err);
>>   }
>> 
>> In this case, I opted to keep it as is because the function will compose
>> a string contaning like:
>> 
>>   A (B)[: C]
>> 
>> Where:
>> 
>>  A = safe_strerror
>>  B = errno
>>  C = fail reason (optional)
>> 
>> This function (linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string) is called in
>> three places:
>> 
>> gdb/linux-nat.c:
>> 
>> 	      std::string reason
>> 		= linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
>> 
>> 	      warning (_("Cannot attach to lwp %d: %s"),
>> 		       lwpid, reason.c_str ());
>> 
>> gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c:
>> 
>> 	  std::string reason
>> 	    = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
>> 
>> 	  warning (_("Cannot attach to lwp %d: %s"), lwpid, reason.c_str ());
>> 
>> and
>> 
>>       std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
>>       error ("Cannot attach to process %ld: %s", pid, reason.c_str ());
>> 
>> 
>> It seems to me like these error messages are expecting a short string to
>> just append to their existing strings, so I didn't think it made much
>> sense to extend the ptrace error checking here as well.  That's why I
>> didn't extend linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string to pass ERR down to
>> linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason.
>
> OK, I think that's just a bit too messy.  Let's take a fresh look at the
> result:
>
>  /* Find all possible reasons we could fail to attach PID and return
>     these as a string.  An empty string is returned if we didn't find
>     any reason.  If ERR is EACCES or EPERM, we also add a warning about
>     possible restrictions to use ptrace.  */
>  extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err = -1);
>
>  /* Find all possible reasons we could have failed to attach to PTID
>     and return them as a string.  ERR is the error PTRACE_ATTACH failed
>     with (an errno).  */
>  extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid_t ptid, int err);
>
> Both the functions have the exact same prototype (same parameters, same return).
> And since they both return std::string, why is linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string
> called "xxx_string"?  From the function names alone, I'd think
> linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string returned a string, while
> linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason returned something else, or printed
> directly.  But that's not the case.
>
> So linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string is used when we're attaching
> to an lwp, other than the thread group leader (the main thread).
> IMO, it'd be better to rename that function accordingly, and update
> its comments accordingly too.
>
> Then, it becomes clearer that linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason is to
> be used in the initial process attach, in which case we want to
> check the ptrace permissions.
>
> Also, we can factor out things such that we don't need the
> default parameter.  I tend to prefer avoiding mode-setting default
> parameters, preferring differently named functions, because default
> parameters make it harder to grep around the sources, distinguishing the
> cases where you passed an argument or not.  In this case,
> the linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason / linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string
> functions serve different purposes, so decoupling them via not using
> default parameters is better, IMO, it avoids missing some conversion
> in some spot.
>
> Which is exactly what happened.  Here's a patch implementing
> the idea.  Notice how gdbserver/linux-low.c:linux_attach
> has a spot where it is currently using linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string
> after attaching to the main thread fails.  That spot should be including
> the new ptrace restrictions fail reasons, but it wasn't due to use of
> linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string:
>
>  @@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ linux_attach (unsigned long pid)
>      {
>        remove_process (proc);
>  
>  -      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
>  +      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid, err);
>        error ("Cannot attach to process %ld: %s", pid, reason.c_str ());
>      }
>
> I haven't checked whether the resulting error message looks good as is,
> or whether we need to tweak that error call in addition.  Can you take it
> from here?
>
> Here's the patch on top of yours.

Sure, thanks for the patch.  I've tried it here and it seems fine.  I'll
submit it integrated into v3 soon.

>
> From a3e8744c1ed7fa8c702009fe3caf8578bb1785ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:15:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason
>
> ---
>  gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c |  4 ++--
>  gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.c |  2 +-
>  gdb/linux-nat.c           |  2 +-
>  gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h    | 10 ++++++----
>  5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> index 1e0a5cbf54d..45cf43ad9ed 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ attach_proc_task_lwp_callback (ptid_t ptid)
>        else if (err != 0)
>  	{
>  	  std::string reason
> -	    = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
> +	    = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp (ptid, err);
>  
>  	  warning (_("Cannot attach to lwp %d: %s"), lwpid, reason.c_str ());
>  	}
> @@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ linux_attach (unsigned long pid)
>      {
>        remove_process (proc);
>  
> -      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
> +      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid, err);
>        error ("Cannot attach to process %ld: %s", pid, reason.c_str ());
>      }
>  
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.c b/gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.c
> index b2791b0513a..cfba05977e6 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ attach_thread (const td_thrhandle_t *th_p, td_thrinfo_t *ti_p)
>    err = linux_attach_lwp (ptid);
>    if (err != 0)
>      {
> -      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
> +      std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp (ptid, err);
>  
>        warning ("Could not attach to thread %ld (LWP %d): %s",
>  	       (unsigned long) ti_p->ti_tid, ti_p->ti_lid, reason.c_str ());
> diff --git a/gdb/linux-nat.c b/gdb/linux-nat.c
> index b5a9eaf72e3..22cb55e6dcc 100644
> --- a/gdb/linux-nat.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-nat.c
> @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ attach_proc_task_lwp_callback (ptid_t ptid)
>  	  else
>  	    {
>  	      std::string reason
> -		= linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid, err);
> +		= linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp (ptid, err);
>  
>  	      warning (_("Cannot attach to lwp %d: %s"),
>  		       lwpid, reason.c_str ());
> diff --git a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c
> index 599d9cfb550..2201a24d812 100644
> --- a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c
> +++ b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c
> @@ -92,10 +92,13 @@ for more details.\n");
>    return ret;
>  }
>  
> -/* See declaration in linux-ptrace.h.  */
> +/* Find all possible reasons we could fail to attach PID and return
> +   these as a string.  An empty string is returned if we didn't find
> +   any reason.  Helper for linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason and
> +   linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp.  */
>  
> -std::string
> -linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err)
> +static std::string
> +linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_1 (pid_t pid)
>  {
>    pid_t tracerpid = linux_proc_get_tracerpid_nowarn (pid);
>    std::string result;
> @@ -111,8 +114,17 @@ linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err)
>  		      "terminated"),
>  		    (int) pid);
>  
> -  std::string ptrace_restrict = linux_ptrace_restricted_fail_reason (err);
> +  return result;
> +}
>  
> +/* See declaration in linux-ptrace.h.  */
> +
> +std::string
> +linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err)
> +{
> +  std::string result = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_1 (pid);
> +
> +  std::string ptrace_restrict = linux_ptrace_restricted_fail_reason (err);
>    if (!ptrace_restrict.empty ())
>      result += "\n" + ptrace_restrict;
>  
> @@ -122,10 +134,10 @@ linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err)
>  /* See linux-ptrace.h.  */
>  
>  std::string
> -linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid_t ptid, int err)
> +linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp (ptid_t ptid, int err)
>  {
>    long lwpid = ptid.lwp ();
> -  std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (lwpid);
> +  std::string reason = linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_1 (lwpid);
>  
>    if (!reason.empty ())
>      return string_printf ("%s (%d), %s", safe_strerror (err), err,
> diff --git a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
> index 04ada53bf69..94c9ba48ba5 100644
> --- a/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
> +++ b/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h
> @@ -180,12 +180,14 @@ struct buffer;
>     these as a string.  An empty string is returned if we didn't find
>     any reason.  If ERR is EACCES or EPERM, we also add a warning about
>     possible restrictions to use ptrace.  */
> -extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err = -1);
> +extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason (pid_t pid, int err);
>  
> -/* Find all possible reasons we could have failed to attach to PTID
> +/* Find all possible reasons we could have failed to attach to LWPID
>     and return them as a string.  ERR is the error PTRACE_ATTACH failed
> -   with (an errno).  */
> -extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_string (ptid_t ptid, int err);
> +   with (an errno).  Unlike linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason, this
> +   function should be used when attaching to an LWP other than the
> +   leader; it does not warn about ptrace restrictions.  */
> +extern std::string linux_ptrace_attach_fail_reason_lwp (ptid_t lwpid, int err);
>  
>  /* When the call to 'ptrace (PTRACE_TRACEME...' fails, and we have
>     already forked, this function can be called in order to try to
> -- 
> 2.14.5

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-04 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-19  3:29 [PATCH] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-19  9:10 ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2019-08-19 13:47   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-19 14:57     ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2019-08-19 16:30     ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-08-19 17:04       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-19 14:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-25 22:38   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-19 18:26 ` Pedro Alves
2019-08-25 22:40   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-26 18:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-26 18:35   ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2019-08-26 20:51     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-26 18:44   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-29 14:40   ` Pedro Alves
2019-08-29 19:27     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-29 19:48       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-30 19:03         ` Pedro Alves
2019-08-30 19:51         ` [PATCH] Remove "\nError: " suffix from nat/fork-inferior.c:trace_start_error warning message Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-30 19:54           ` Pedro Alves
2019-08-30 21:06             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-30 12:45       ` [PATCH v2] Improve ptrace-error detection on Linux targets Pedro Alves
2019-09-04 19:21         ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2019-09-04 19:31         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-04 19:58           ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-04 20:21             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-04 20:35               ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-04 20:56                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-04 21:23                   ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-04 21:36                     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-05 12:19                       ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-05 17:58                         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-08-30 12:47   ` Pedro Alves
2019-08-30 14:07     ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-30 19:44       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-04 19:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-05 17:04   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-11  1:11 ` [PATCH v4] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-12 12:39   ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-09-12 18:29     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-24 20:40   ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-25 14:14     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-25 22:04       ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-26  4:22         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-26  4:22 ` [PATCH v5] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-26 17:32   ` Tom Tromey
2019-09-26 17:48     ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 17:51       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-26 18:14         ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 18:25           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-26 17:50     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-09-26 18:13   ` Pedro Alves
2019-09-26 18:23     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06   ` [PATCH 0/6] Improve ptrace-error detection Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 6/6] Fix comment for 'gdb_dlopen' Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:23       ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-02-26 20:49         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 15:21       ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-28 16:05         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 5/6] Document Linux-specific possible ptrace restrictions Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 21:00       ` Ruslan Kabatsayev
2020-02-26 22:08         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 3/6] Expand 'fork_inferior' to check whether 'traceme_fun' succeeded Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 2/6] Don't reset errno/bfd_error on 'throw_perror_with_name' Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 15:29       ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-28 16:36         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 18:58           ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-28 19:50             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 20:06         ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-28 20:35           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 21:11             ` Pedro Alves
2020-03-02 20:07               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 19:49       ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-28 20:01         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 1/6] Introduce scoped_pipe.h Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 15:23       ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-28 16:08         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 18:57           ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-28 19:48             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 19:20       ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-28 19:47         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-28 20:07           ` Pedro Alves
2020-02-26 20:06     ` [PATCH 4/6] Extend GNU/Linux to check for ptrace error Sergio Durigan Junior
     [not found]     ` <87v9nh3yme.fsf@redhat.com>
2020-03-15  4:21       ` [PATCH 0/6] Improve ptrace-error detection Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-15 21:16         ` Kevin Buettner
2020-03-17 15:47     ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-17 15:47       ` [PATCH v2 1/5] Introduce scoped_pipe.h Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-17 15:47       ` [PATCH v2 2/5] Don't reset errno/bfd_error on 'throw_perror_with_name' Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-27 18:20         ` Pedro Alves
2020-03-17 15:47       ` [PATCH v2 3/5] Expand 'fork_inferior' to check whether 'traceme_fun' succeeded Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-27  4:14         ` Kevin Buettner
2020-03-27 13:06         ` Pedro Alves
2020-03-17 15:47       ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Extend GNU/Linux to check for ptrace error Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-27 15:28         ` Pedro Alves
2020-03-27 17:02         ` Kevin Buettner
2020-03-17 15:47       ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Document Linux-specific possible ptrace restrictions Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-03-20  0:53       ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Improve ptrace-error detection Kevin Buettner
2020-03-24 18:23         ` Sergio Durigan Junior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877e6nsw8h.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=b7.10110111@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox