From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id wBuZEvo4JmI8DQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 11:55:22 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4A4D21F3CA; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:55:22 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1CF1EA69 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:55:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9CC3857C6E for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 16:55:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B9CC3857C6E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1646672121; bh=8XRRWyLetawJQsIFNzHipfmfYjioldbjLyJP5iwr+iY=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=r7lRKmXgpPzDjFIkGUUnX3bTCJS4/dcyWxxwYZJxrgbvVbpnQ9AhRz2QuDXPgOTgJ 7o6bAI3uP6X8QRXca12ww6ucajd0FY6j42HsQKzmNGsrvpAzfUHwWBlerEB60dpml2 F4nkymRYkUtqvpNTaGV1EjzQ05rqDUpjIOntTyjI= Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECD5385841B for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:28:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9ECD5385841B Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id i1so11798138ila.7 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8XRRWyLetawJQsIFNzHipfmfYjioldbjLyJP5iwr+iY=; b=v+a4cAJr2k6EAleQRpYHNP/TWQcImUuq4FtQCe1xwun90/VEAoFiOflH8j82r0yAOn yaHrvqhIQ2JRagl8JBVIu8TfCsn+IOgJbYLzPJ5Z7v9XQ1D//oYJl1xq1ZtZ/ZKIBUTo QSV62V5sEWbnMlDmLsvt7+Jmf4+nkSWfYGT7Fxo3JYUXW1dBUPK4Xw09nx4d1goN4jc3 DidV+g3BP6hnKHcFn1WlfhiU1ASHKryQaISAN7MyTDi+137ZiNdzlSf5Dwy7ZcoZ8mww xVeBc6zawgm6Rru7nCHfGA4RdBsqsgvn5Y9vnWrYDmIG2kAXGg8uZWHVjA+IugVg5FFw m1Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531f9tEY3CaGFIZCn8oLPQOCn5faYAvZbgDB8xtME6hBJjHGtNg5 KDTpQdQbqx3T9co8ifLP8IyUhjSsAsWTag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSv5hM9hrjLJLDS9R+BbT7ygR4WsBflVpGVDmBAVulpYEoamIxVy7e+zXbBQCXkGwWX8fX2w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1567:b0:2bf:adf4:43ec with SMTP id k7-20020a056e02156700b002bfadf443ecmr11225834ilu.215.1646666890087; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from murgatroyd (75-166-141-253.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.141.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h22-20020a5d9716000000b00645e6e57d5dsm443309iol.1.2022.03.07.07.28.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 07:28:09 -0800 (PST) To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement real literal extension for Ada References: <20220301170055.1520935-1-tromey@adacore.com> <20220301170055.1520935-3-tromey@adacore.com> <8335k1lh9e.fsf@gnu.org> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 08:28:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8335k1lh9e.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:22:37 +0200") Message-ID: <877d95rddi.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Eli> "Exact byte contents" is not the best way to describe this Eli> specification of a value. If no better idea emerges, how about using Eli> the same description as you used in the manual? I did this, thanks. Tom