From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mAuLOhFkq2fhPysAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:52:01 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Iag/bF1V; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id E510F1E105; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:52:01 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CA01E05C for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:52:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45983858C51 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:52:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E45983858C51 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Iag/bF1V Received: from omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.39]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19BBB3858CDB for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:51:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 19BBB3858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 19BBB3858CDB Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.39 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739285487; cv=none; b=I5hzmEbllh/naQCPLlMG7bPWvgyZoXkHFlZHFj+TUq8sNAqBIUAamWkY2xFaWGLHFJnsay6CrMWmHEwgOEVp8drMHv3lYkV2+2pI5WiO84MDe5w33BADJXYwE3ZQa/C9AoWHN3qkiuwVVAX0eFuOkQgp0nnBsNHv4K3ediaNq54= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1739285487; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MWrkyY3nr36T4JPmUn4LEZXcg0UGTpwBNzzvlAPcmh8=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=DcMoAJzjOGXUxhq+VtfGp9it3sGoE3z9gezpB/F1VOTHYxe7G7f1vzzPpTuEHBoKbbehgZmsZiOLPEhXuWzx9hCcDO+Vcz9+Api20EFX7TSZCpAuEX7SXZdqb4DmX87R5z4PtNsAmfmqi9b8kAYVpEONd9g6VGwXJOXDRH8Ku/U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19BBB3858CDB Received: from eig-obgw-5005a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.234]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id hn3ptZrGBVkcRhrbitcpKC; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:51:26 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id hrbht4K2nhQfUhrbit1TiM; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:51:26 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Negt1HD4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67ab63ee a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=T2h4t0Lz3GQA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=-TgpxQuZUK-bE0X6NxkA:9 a=1AcFbo0GkVkA:10 a=6Ogn3jAGHLSNbaov7Orx:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MWrkyY3nr36T4JPmUn4LEZXcg0UGTpwBNzzvlAPcmh8=; b=Iag/bF1Vldco8CmV983BV/7KfS S1rrpdzjVYLsXZBijJWzEPEHGcdZr1oJ+SC9JiXX1Djr+Rqu0i1oMvz/EtmXz10rfU2w7XRRox1dI 1yhmqIYDQPg6FK8aHMV5F+sHr; Received: from 97-118-36-154.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.118.36.154]:59076 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1thrbh-002Zd0-1I; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:51:25 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Guinevere Larsen Cc: Kevin Buettner , Stephan Rohr , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org, tom@tromey.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] gdb: remove check for minimal symbols in 'start_command' In-Reply-To: (Guinevere Larsen's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:09:23 -0300") References: <20250127154211.2509613-1-stephan.rohr@intel.com> <20250127154211.2509613-2-stephan.rohr@intel.com> <20250127162830.5d10b4f7@f41-zbm-amd> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:51:24 -0700 Message-ID: <877c5wh6vn.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.118.36.154 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1thrbh-002Zd0-1I X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-118-36-154.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [97.118.36.154]:59076 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 11 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfJwFQrAaJREz4Jt7zQ7A5PdCGh0WEFo5avAycV/N5AgtHUNVLtgq4TtPah5OBN42s1BKrJbD/pErRFrFfDjIJoMRm34knIZBz1Zdbkzuxp3VkvBjaqiW YZSu9PIF3hlN+kEDKgRGufR1Rj4HrbeyWzUWUaZyCg74nIqKqaMp3nWC78+xTj6IMV0AKAPLTC5EhCO4boBWgY68Gfe4Kab3SRg= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Guinevere" == Guinevere Larsen writes: Guinevere> Has this patch been pushed it already? I just ran into this in a Guinevere> different situation and it would be nice to have the fix upstreamed :) If it's approved, then IMO it's fine to push it if you want. Tom