From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qZmWHXqiXmnjHjEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 13:14:18 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=G+txmlVQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 74FE61E08D; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 13:14:18 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227431E08D for ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 13:14:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99664BA2E04 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 18:14:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A99664BA2E04 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=G+txmlVQ Received: from omta34.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta34.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.89.44.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E05D4BA2E06 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2026 18:13:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7E05D4BA2E06 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7E05D4BA2E06 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=35.89.44.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767809627; cv=none; b=OSHNpCR/DFYBQ0yELkFVyMSxAELx5JL2AYJW4goaLtwQHbmbBDq5vVDGyx+ecUvKWg1Tq+8Wsh6DUcZsYr50sYmSOVz1dDcWwJg6woxxYTCm/dz30Vt001yvbqSPEC/3h8/pJ2H5BNrqDutpeVCYFsGNwr8O8n5cGXfw7AJr4BY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1767809627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iS6NnoWKXOwfsbEZnyqv6jDwrYWNr6QY+wYoes6+bzk=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=EGZr3BnWGQvbFemqsq1gppGT+d6GAMqu4++k8L/txR9sl5xOFnemLX4QaOMnSMQ+siuPneZWzvHN/pqClESqc4F/2aOcxuhAAejFPc6GCjGUjKjviCYhPdvdzKkWuTd4BIlFeh1uDrZOm7zEU9ImR+t/oir+TDnyo1W3CPB5k+I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E05D4BA2E06 Received: from eig-obgw-6006b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.211]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id dXOyvqzprKjfodY2UvJXEJ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:13:46 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id dY2Tve7OqvXvHdY2UvzSVL; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:13:46 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=e4IGSbp/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=695ea25a a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=vUbySO9Y5rIA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=Xk5apCEzoHsENKcSosUA:9 a=DCx65vhANUyCzuf5D8fC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=z3GA7AxIFjhe2aPy1fgzVK1vsJsPPPu6oqMa+MNcVQ0=; b=G+txmlVQ1SxzHNiK8O/+04H0KI wcRKVE4MW3+2T7GSehdUPhGTmyTPfbys26IIkJF6dl4Odbhxu3ozqLyYqZVc45AlWam3hSdwmRyL8 iOhAIybxLzqaRKKp6tEGAb6vh; Received: from 75-166-246-134.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.246.134]:43380 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vdY2T-00000003u0a-2htJ; Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:13:45 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Burgess Cc: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb] Fix heap-buffer-overflow in args_complete_p In-Reply-To: <87tswxv555.fsf@redhat.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2026 15:01:10 +0000") References: <20260103145559.2722584-1-tdevries@suse.de> <874iozygr7.fsf@redhat.com> <7beac4be-7924-48b5-804b-6400efd02834@suse.de> <875x9dwvhe.fsf@redhat.com> <87tswxv555.fsf@redhat.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 11:13:44 -0700 Message-ID: <877bttqoiv.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.246.134 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1vdY2T-00000003u0a-2htJ X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-246-134.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [75.166.246.134]:43380 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 8 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfB59JdhBoUqRshpqFo67tQCBHc6WCSfTZ8XBvWQtxiMJkpQYBROKPj3twSS2FyhJ7hDt5xFy2ZUpYPE1hqhG51HDWblOCrXBg1yp5g/5pBXLEJ4sIcwG g4ze+H4dC8m1MH0vRyuYydcbsCTMwc86sXeJZJoNNuqXx2ZHTahTLIFKbt1zkKw7QHvq2lpTm2L1lsE1HH4nsrGadIHrBVK0USA= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Andrew> Maybe one day we'll move off the mailing list model. What would it take? What I'd like ideally is that landing patches be done via the UI. That way we could have some guarantee that what lands is what is reviewed. I don't think this is possible with the current setup though. For my part I think my main worry is that I'd miss patches that I want to be involved in. Anyway it seems clear that the current approach isn't working extremely well. I don't know about anyone else but I have >3500 "pending" messages in gdb-patches, some dating back years. And probably more than half of those are actual unreviewed patches. Tom