From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11948 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2012 22:08:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11939 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2012 22:08:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:08:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q28M8MCJ008791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:08:22 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q28M8L3q027982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:08:22 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb_get_line_number on unknown tags References: <4F592C48.7000500@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F592C48.7000500@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:01:44 -0800") Message-ID: <8762een3u2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: Keith> This is occurring because the two tests which do it are using Keith> gdb_get_line_number on a tag which is not defined in the source Keith> file. I wonder whether this should be an error. Keith> 2012-03-08 Keith Seitz Keith> * gdb.ada/array_bounds.exp: Get breakpoint for line Keith> with "START", not "STOP". Keith> * gdb.python/py-infthread.exp: Do not continue to Keith> line marked "Break here.", which is undefined. Ok. Tom