From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14697 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2013 17:28:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 14689 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2013 17:28:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:28:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0GHSUM6008971 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:28:30 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0GHSSFJ018220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:28:29 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: [2/2] catch signal References: <874nkpv03j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121202093807.GA21883@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87y5hfvu5v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87mwwq2kjh.fsf_-_@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87mwwq2kjh.fsf_-_@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:22:58 -0700") Message-ID: <87622xghqb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This rebases the "catch signal" patch on top of the previous Tom> "catch-type" patch. It addresses all the earlier comments. I'm checking this in now. Tom