From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16237 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2013 18:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16220 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2013 18:33:21 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_STOCKGEN,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:33:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2KIXHFD002721 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:33:18 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2KIXGbc010536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:33:17 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/3] unconditionally call via SYMBOL_COMPUTED_OPS References: <871udlhzzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <871udlhzzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:08:56 -0700") Message-ID: <87620l9b0z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> There are some FIXME comments scattered about the code concerning the Tom> unconditional use of SYMBOL_COMPUTED_OPS. Tom> I think the idea here was that we could remove LOC_COMPUTED entirely, Tom> and just have a computed ops vector alongside some other LOC_* constant. I'm checking this in now. Regtested again on x86-64 Fedora 18. Tom