From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21919 invoked by alias); 14 May 2013 19:04:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21908 invoked by uid 89); 14 May 2013 19:04:51 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 May 2013 19:04:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4EJ4mRH012948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 May 2013 15:04:48 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-133.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.133]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4EJ4km7027564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 14 May 2013 15:04:47 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] add cleanup checker and fix cleanup bugs References: <20130510082304.GG9160@adacore.com> <87li7mhpji.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130511104120.GM9160@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130511104120.GM9160@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Sat, 11 May 2013 14:41:20 +0400") Message-ID: <8761yl5qnl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 >> More ideally I'd like gdb to use gerrit and have patches be >> automatically checked as part of the submission process. I think this >> would be better than post hoc checking, or requiring everybody to have a >> long checklist of things to do. Joel> ... I like this approach. Yeah. It has to be a long-term thing though. I think it is a substantial amount of work to set it all up. Tom