From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22134 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2014 21:12:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22120 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2014 21:12:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: layla.krisman.be Received: from layla.krisman.be (HELO layla.krisman.be) (176.31.208.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:12:31 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (envelope-from ) id 1XdQMl-0001Ia-EY; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 23:07:48 +0200 From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Catch syscall group In-Reply-To: <87d2a2czjx.fsf@redhat.com> (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:10:42 -0400") References: <1412736678-2760-1-git-send-email-gabriel@krisman.be> <87d2a2czjx.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8761fp6lhk.fsf@anubis.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1383 Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > On Tuesday, October 07 2014, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This multi-part patch implements on top of the 'catch syscall' command >> the ability to catch a group of related syscalls using a single >> command. > Sergio and Doug, Thank you both for your review. >> (Please note that adding this feature to GDB was first suggested by Tom >> Tromey on PR 15879. :-) >> ). > > It is good to mention the bug in the ChangeLog, even if you are not > directly fixing it. Ok. > I will make comments in the patch itself, but it would be nice if you > could do that for the other existing XML files as well. You didn't > mention if you intend to do so or not. > > I know it will be kind of boring, but unfortunately those XML files are > not being really maintained nowadays (a problem I intend to address soon > with some patches and proposals), so if you don't touch those files now > they will probably be forgotten for quite some time... > > However, this is just a request, so if you don't have the time to do > that now I'd still vote for including this feature on GDB. I intend to do so for other architectures, but forgot to mention in my original message. Still, I won't be able to test on some platforms. Thanks. --=20 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 818 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUOu63AAoJEO9pqxSS5VgPk9oP/0F4nwvK1HKGilrP8iNpBUU6 Wi8p2WMew+94AKeKQIF8z5f4Ynd540n5/27dMiQuuaKstm7bQaWNfOvxqps44+9j eJdA7Pyk9GAtZkkELiBaPxZ4JanMLtUcoc2UkjcOtzKfayMLDamA5c1a9ZMKyYIN xIdU+HvhVSqlu209FSFNmOI/JIPijHv9OeRRFqNUN+APtozsE6QDrIEqbSDIgtqZ xUE3qZUKYf936sH2ir9t+pyXI57em+kr5KGaOEzzRbilzl3CI9uMwwkjhnjGlF/J TSM2J1gt5vzw/H/BbhdvEly7fsHpZ4ojWLqLESaVLn48T7TiQwqCnHO3Atz1wp/D CoO/InvhRgXIGE8YqGlmbLoGX8V+q38+b2zqfdQp5CAQcGGESL1ibFs6eP+VXh/y 07cMN8MRQENEmZoILmPRDZRoYSBcnU8wL+Duexf0EG0hb8FG/YxyOwV+8KefYL7s qih/Sm1u4Kp/X705+H3317BW8G6SxlxGGafC/O6vDCdvAqNh925Wpj+awq1fPIRZ uarO3X0NgAbSb6Bt6sGst+L9cxcZrq9xCUFy/LvDKpCjkbMNwu4+QXB9XHSic5o+ Awj4FgUhldaxc2ERJW+5kp0ctuVfOYsRE/KvAiyFMmUB1W33+cKOZovmQKQ/HRGZ YCfFEdFk5kIKBScfg36u =0Gkp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--