From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4873 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2019 20:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4863 invoked by uid 89); 5 Mar 2019 20:46:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:46:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9477756144; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:46:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NB5BjA+uB6-5; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:46:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from murgatroyd (75-166-85-218.hlrn.qwest.net [75.166.85.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7AD56143; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:46:55 -0500 (EST) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Change the_dummy_target to be a global References: <20190304204100.27702-1-tromey@adacore.com> <38644529-a5d6-1e24-97f8-b13b30bb87dd@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <38644529-a5d6-1e24-97f8-b13b30bb87dd@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:15:22 +0000") Message-ID: <875zsxrqv5.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Yes, I think that's fine. Pedro> At some point in the multi-target branch I made a change like that, Pedro> but the current state of the branch it's back to being heap-allocated. Pedro> I'm not seeing any reason that requires that, though. I replicated Pedro> the change on top of the branch and ran the new multi-target tests, Pedro> and they all still passed. Thanks, I'll check it in then. Tom