From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QHARHGr/h2B3BAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:11:22 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 624661F11C; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:11:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778331E01F for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05873894423; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:11:20 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D05873894423 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619525480; bh=kFpzQOz1jXh+pdtQAs1o16thtiA33c/CSE6D3HwY2xw=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=vkWiDeQrht6pn7e4avGIuQZeXKPzuwQIXWAzqxXFaJKUHpA2VYAVvFICu2wo4cgDv +7RnHMwE52h1P9lzXDLguE8jW02lfJiHb1ZljUk8uW72SlINVHpohoJeR0zPOLC2Js jQXcrV2yNh7fF2uJ5t1M9ZGRDEYlBG7NcHd8zaEw= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CD4383582A for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:11:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 34CD4383582A Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-318-qN7zLxNtMD2_J0Aa1h8HXA-1; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 08:11:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qN7zLxNtMD2_J0Aa1h8HXA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4780380ED8D; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-113-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A8C5D9F2; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:11:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Emil Velikov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nptl_db: Support different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) References: <87czuum5yb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87pmyq4k4k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:11:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Emil Velikov's message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:46:56 +0100") Message-ID: <875z08nczm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Florian Weimer Cc: Pedro Alves , Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" * Emil Velikov: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 11:57, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> > Are there any plans for glibc 2.33.1 or shall I ask the Arch Linux >> > maintainers to include this in the package? >> >> I'm going to backport it to the release branch, but we probably won't >> make an actual 2.33.1 release from it. So it depends on what Arch Linux >> does with the release branch. > I can see the patch landed in master \o/ but it's missing in the 2.33 branch. > Did it slip through the cracks or you're simply EBUSY with the > nptl/c11 pthread to libc transition? I wanted to give it a test in Fedora rawhide, but we cannot rebuild glibc there due to an unrelated issue right now. I can backport it blindly if it helps. Thanks, Florian