From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8cbuLDSbzWihwAoAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 14:04:36 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lv4d93wo; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B2DC51E04C; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 14:04:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 441941E04C for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 14:04:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF713858C50 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:04:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CAF713858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lv4d93wo Received: from omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D5A3858CD9 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:04:03 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 20D5A3858CD9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 20D5A3858CD9 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1758305043; cv=none; b=VyBhW5KiKVD1UPsBtyZReGIRJueoaJADnEEEJLhtbRtc6+mIRZQ+Tramx2iucy1M65qNSts/UGBANGmi8zi4UZ0orVBbq83cNv+gphEY5kCMZttnUYt8iiFadI6xqmCxOAj1HWayAj58TOii6THskv1Vs8BHS0GrH2jY/GilBz4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1758305043; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1gtQQoTm90mdD14OtXEejGVVI7ZbbstpDEi0VB886NE=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=bEYxwHt6pfJwx3axISGg6RfXWcVrnAF9bkOrTUUN0xiCVVFf4ZRhsPm8J0ufV4CBxYVdH7vtM6RZHkLJ/BfEdI2UAHpcuzTXrDjnhvi6rCo7WBujL1saxKA/26sey9X+OtARXfl7QlHs/SV9Y9OV1NPXbhRwWJcxK4o48+pFXUU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20D5A3858CD9 Received: from eig-obgw-6006b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.211]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id zOXkuEhQEKXDJzfSkufJ52; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:04:02 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id zfSju2a8zMem5zfSju8R1J; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:04:02 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=bZtrUPPB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68cd9b12 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=yJojWOMRYYMA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=6-0o3bR0qlapBZh07NwA:9 a=VS4QxaUSPT0UtbFnIvSC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VJpiNpB6JnnS6eyVoJUtB2I624aP4wA1Q1leAGSsn/w=; b=lv4d93wonjIiKQegkQlJSluxim UKSiUVWxb17qiLHQt+4njSl9YaJvjdc1LV1Si/BblNJm7h9SoN/RThy+yv9P2F0waMHEbb+cXDtgf 2A0UDFGAcCPAF90BX7e4y1SYw; Received: from 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.110.68]:53570 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1uzfSj-00000001b6r-1DJi; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:04:01 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Simon Marchi Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] gdbsupport: use dynamic partitioning in gdb::parallel_for_each In-Reply-To: <3d46fcb8-745f-4e0c-9de0-b27251bb37a3@polymtl.ca> (Simon Marchi's message of "Fri, 19 Sep 2025 13:47:36 -0400") References: <20250703200130.4095761-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <87frcjh9iz.fsf@tromey.com> <3d46fcb8-745f-4e0c-9de0-b27251bb37a3@polymtl.ca> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:04:00 -0600 Message-ID: <875xdee2un.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.110.68 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1uzfSj-00000001b6r-1DJi X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [97.122.110.68]:53570 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfKfPxiCJOs4CzAiPTr0KYTPvf13PtmwrxWYjm2N/036tQQOgrQebGCoGfcyo+WgmiiAEStMtM18+cHtegTrinTuT8RL9lZKui3k2rQjvHwUiBEVNDYNd 67sfhaRrXomXjVb1DM+QUiiDZsyuHQDpxZ9YuAJuSY4skuJnjGkGmjmEJcoKHJnSXkKG0efZg7D+at7wjSkJYEDjR3jguVblQCM= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >> I do wonder if this functionality should just be intrinsic to >> thread-pool somehow, like separate the notions of a "task" and a "job >> queue". Simon> I think you'll have to talk me through it, because I don't immediately Simon> see what you mean (perhaps because it's been a while since I worked on Simon> this). I just mean, instead of having this partitioning being a feature of parallel_for_each, maybe this is something that should just be directly in thread-pool, since it seems to be the only way that threads are actually used. I wouldn't worry about it though. It's better to just go with what we have. We can refactor it again later if it seems worthwhile. Tom