From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1631 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 16:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1596 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 16:15:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:15:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PGFVpV008617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:15:31 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6PGFTuL028890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:15:30 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com, palves@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdb, python: update threads in Inferior.threads () References: <1342711757-7243-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20120719184050.GA15108@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120719184050.GA15108@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:40:50 +0200") Message-ID: <874novkeam.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00548.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> OK with the issue below but please check it in only after several Jan> days, there is questionable the caching of threads list. I think making thread notification smarter, as you mention upthread, would be good, but isn't needed for this patch. This patch is an improvement on its own. Tom