From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2263 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 17:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 2250 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2012 17:23:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:23:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8BHNOfV011599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:23:24 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8BHNNdx028553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:23:23 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Yao Qi , Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Don't allow setting register in non-innermost frame References: <1345170040-25959-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <87hartpodt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120907164544.GA18234@host2.jankratochvil.net> <504D49DA.6070006@codesourcery.com> <87ehm8a3gg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120911171932.GA23134@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120911171932.GA23134@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:19:32 +0200") Message-ID: <874nn4a2yc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> I also did not like TYPE_OBJFILE_OWNED too much, I was thinking putting it Jan> possibly to Jan> evaluate_subexp_standard Jan> checking there LHS (left hand side) expression, not the LHS value. Yeah, I almost mentioned that approach as well. I agree it would probably be ok; but it also requires checking whether any language overrides this opcode. Tom