From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5055 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2014 18:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5045 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2014 18:26:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:26:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1SIQfm6007238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:26:42 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-183.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.183]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1SIQei3028262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:26:41 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2] fix regressions with target-async References: <1393609699-26407-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <5310D2F9.2090507@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5310D2F9.2090507@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:18:33 +0000") Message-ID: <874n3jf5zz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00879.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> Looks like a nice solution to me. I'm happy to see the Pedro> find_default_... default methods disappear. FAOD there is still find_default_supports_disable_randomization. I think this is fixable, but it wasn't related to the bug at hand. Pedro> But this looks bogus to me -- it's only reachable if you already Pedro> have the target pushed because you're debugging a threaded core, Pedro> and then do "attach"... Now that there's a public AIX box I suppose I have no excuse. I'll give it a try and see what happens. If it fails then I think we'll need some explicit field on the target rather than trying to deduce properties of the target based on whether it implements some methods. Tom