From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PING²] PR external/{16327,16328}: Remove etc/configure.texi and etc/standards.texi
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874mz6elh2.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140627024638.GC23042@bubble.grove.modra.org> (Alan Modra's message of "Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:16:38 +0930")
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> skribis:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:57:23PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> etc/ChangeLog
>> 2014-06-26 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
>>
>> PR external/16327
>> PR external/16328
>> * Makefile.in (MAKEINFO, TEXI2DVI, TEXI2PDF, TEXI2HTML, DVIPS,
>> TEXIDIR, INFOFILES, DVIFILES, PDFFILES, HTMLFILES): Remove.
>> (all): Remove dependency on 'info'.
>> (install): Remove dependency on 'install-info'.
>> (standards.info, standards.html, standards.dvi, standards.ps)
>> standards.pdf, configure.info, configure.dvi, configure.ps,
>> configure.pdf, configure.pdf): Remove.
>> (info, install-info, html, install-html, dvi, pdf, install-pdf)
>> clean, maintainer-clean, realclean): Remove body.
>> * etc/configbuild.ein, etc/configbuild.fig, etc/configbuild.jin,
>> etc/configbuild.tin, etc/configdev.ein, etc/configdev.fig,
>> etc/configdev.jin, etc/configdev.tin, etc/configure.texi,
>> etc/fdl.texi, etc/gnu-oids.texi, etc/make-stds.texi,
>> etc/standards.texi: Remove.
>
> I think we've had enough time for anyone to register disagreement with
> this patch, so OK to apply.
OK, pushed to master.
It would make sense to push it to gdb-7.8-branch as well, WDYT?
> I notice this leaves us with a Makefile that does nothing. As a
> followup you might like to delete etc/configure* and etc/Makefile.in
> and remove the line "host_modules= { module= etc; };" in the top level
> Makefile.def. I also see this in Makefile.tpl
> dist:
> @echo "Building a full distribution of this tree isn't done"
> @echo "via 'make dist'. Check out the etc/ subdirectory"
> Seems like that should be removed too.
Right, I’ll look into it.
> The top level Makefile.def and Makefile.tpl changes (and regen of
> Makefile.in) would need to be applied to mainline gcc too.
OK.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 15:51 [PATCH] " Ludovic Courtès
2014-05-13 16:35 ` [PING] " Ludovic Courtès
2014-05-13 17:29 ` Pedro Alves
2014-05-14 10:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-06-26 12:57 ` [PATCH][PING²] " Ludovic Courtès
2014-06-27 2:46 ` Alan Modra
2014-06-27 9:43 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2014-07-07 14:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-07 15:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-07-07 15:22 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874mz6elh2.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox