Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>,
	 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	 "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add support for the --readnever command-line option (DWARF only)
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lpj8lta.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a70f1f41-6ac1-699a-7d2c-bf0c5095809b@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:17:54 +0000")

On Friday, November 24 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:

> On 11/24/2017 04:54 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 23 2017, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/23/2017 05:21 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> +This option is currently limited to debug information in DWARF format.
>>>>>> +For all other format, this option has no effect.
>>>>>
>>>>> How hard would it be to just make it work?  There's only stabs and mdebug
>>>>> left, I think?  There should be a single a function somewhere that we can
>>>>> add an early return.  And then we don't need to document this limitation...
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, in elf_symfile_read, we could just skip the elf_locate_sections
>>>>> call.  In coffread.c we could skip reading stabs right after 
>>>>>   bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, coff_locate_sections....);
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking for:
>>>>>
>>>>>  $ grep -h "^[a-z]*_build_psymtabs" gdb/
>>>>>  coffstab_build_psymtabs (struct objfile *objfile,
>>>>>  elfstab_build_psymtabs (struct objfile *objfile, asection *stabsect,
>>>>>  stabsect_build_psymtabs (struct objfile *objfile, char *stab_name,
>>>>>  mdebug_build_psymtabs (minimal_symbol_reader &reader,
>>>>>  elfmdebug_build_psymtabs (struct objfile *objfile,
>>>>>
>>>>> finds all the relevant places.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it wouldn't be that hard to make this be an objfile flag
>>>>> afterall (like OBJF_READNOW is).  That'd make it possible
>>>>> to add the location "-readnever" counterpart switch to add-symbol-file
>>>>> too, BTW:
>>>
>>> I meant "logical" instead of "location".  I was staring at
>>> gdb/location.c at that time.  :-P
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  symfile.c:        if (strcmp (arg, "-readnow") == 0)
>>>>>  symfile.c:        else if (strcmp (arg, "-readnow") == 0)
>>>>
>>>> Hm, I'll look into this.  Just to make it clear: the idea is to have
>>>> both a --readnever global option and also a OBJF_READNEVER specific to
>>>> each objfile?
>>>
>>> Sure, the idea is to do something similar to what's done for --readnow.
>> 
>> Sorry, but I guess I need a few more details on this.
>> 
>> The way I understand the code at elf_symfile_read, the very first thing
>> to do would be to check if OBJF_READNEVER is set and return early if it
>> is.  But it seems that you're proposing something a bit different when
>> you say that we should "... just skip the elf_locate_sections call."  It
>> doesn't seem to me that is worth continuing on that function if
>> OBJF_READNEVER is present.
>
> No, you can't return early the very first thing, because
>  --readnever is supposed to skip _debug_ info, not ELF/minimal symbols...
> So the "return early" would have to be _after_ the
> elf_read_minimal_symbols call:

Hm, OK, it makes sense and I confess I thought "why is Pedro mentioning
elf_symfile_read if the feature is about skipping DWARF, not ELF?".

>  static void
>  elf_symfile_read (struct objfile *objfile, symfile_add_flags symfile_flags)
>  {
>    bfd *abfd = objfile->obfd;
>    struct elfinfo ei;
>
>    memset ((char *) &ei, 0, sizeof (ei));
>    bfd_map_over_sections (abfd, elf_locate_sections, (void *) & ei);
>  
>    elf_read_minimal_symbols (objfile, symfile_flags, &ei);
>
> I don't know whether we can reorder that.  Maybe we can.
>
> When I looked at this quickly yesterday, I saw that elf_location_sections
> is what finds the stabs and mdebug sections:
>
> static void
> elf_locate_sections (bfd *ignore_abfd, asection *sectp, void *eip)
> {
>   struct elfinfo *ei;
>
>   ei = (struct elfinfo *) eip;
>   if (strcmp (sectp->name, ".stab") == 0)
>     {
>       ei->stabsect = sectp;
>     }
>   else if (strcmp (sectp->name, ".mdebug") == 0)
>     {
>       ei->mdebugsect = sectp;
>     }
> }
>
> and it seemed to be that skipping the section location would make
> the parts of  elf_symfile_read that actually read the symbols
> be no-ops, because the stabsect/mdebusect pointers would be NULL.
>
> But if returning early or something else works, that's fine.

OK, thanks for clarifying.

>> As for the *_build_psymtabs functions, I am doing exactly that: if
>> objfile->flags contains OBJF_READNEVER, then just return and do nothing.
>
> Sure, that should work too.  It's just the difference between
> skipping checking whether debug info is available (skipping before
> calling into those), vs letting gdb do the work to figure out whether
> debug info is available, but then ignore it.
> The grep for "*_build_psymtabs" was intended as a pointer to find
> what the relevant code is, including to look at the code that
> is calling those functions, see if there's something to be done there.

I think it makes more sense, logically speaking, to not mess with
elf_symfile_read and instead modify the *_build_psymtabs functions.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-24 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-06 20:54 [RFC/RFA] " Joel Brobecker
2016-07-12 14:27 ` Yao Qi
2016-10-04 18:07   ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23  0:54     ` [PATCH v2] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-23 12:09       ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23 17:21         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-23 17:29           ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-24  4:54             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-24 13:18               ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-24 20:27                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2017-11-27 19:13                   ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29  0:59                     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 12:23                       ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-23 15:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-23 19:36         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2016-10-04 18:06 ` [RFC/RFA] " Pedro Alves
2017-11-24 23:01 ` [PATCH v2] Add support for the --readnever command-line option Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-25  7:33   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-25 16:41     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-25 17:16       ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-29  1:21 ` [PATCH v3] Add support for the readnever concept Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29  3:39   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-29 12:25   ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 18:43     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 21:45     ` [PATCH] Make 'symbol-file' not care about the position of command line arguments Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 22:26       ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-29 22:42         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 23:15           ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30  0:08             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30  0:34               ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30  4:07                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30  4:25       ` [PATCH v2] Make '{add-,}symbol-file' " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 10:57         ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 12:38           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 12:49             ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 13:06               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 13:33       ` [PATCH v3] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 15:01         ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 17:26           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 17:37             ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 17:43               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 17:50                 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-30 20:00       ` [PATCH v4] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 12:11         ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 17:41           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 21:45             ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 22:02               ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30  0:25 ` [PATCH v4] Add support for the readnever concept Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-30 11:53   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01  4:35     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 12:43       ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 17:19         ` Tom Tromey
2017-12-01 17:21           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 20:00             ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-01 22:16 ` [PATCH v5] " Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-01 23:19   ` Pedro Alves
2017-12-02  2:31     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-12-02  8:21   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874lpj8lta.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox