From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17176 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2012 19:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 17166 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2012 19:31:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:31:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HJVfOM016105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:31:41 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3HJVdch005952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:31:40 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] Support 64-bit constants/enums on 32-bit host [Re: [PATCH] Allow 64-bit enum values] References: <20120220132724.GB4753@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <87d397syts.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120229135148.GA32128@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120301224428.GA30631@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120305063542.GA30196@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120305080512.GA12311@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120321100630.GA14496@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120417130833.GB15356@host2.jankratochvil.net> <878vhuwhrd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120417190903.GA7437@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120417190903.GA7437@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:09:03 +0200") Message-ID: <873982task.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> While I would never have that idea myself I can also do: Jan> #ifdef BFD64 Jan> LONGEST ivalue; Jan> #else Jan> long ivalue; Jan> #endif Jan> It always keeps the memory footprint and makes 64-bit constants working on Jan> 32-bit gdb --enable-64-bit-bfd builds. I think on the whole I'd prefer your original patch over this. I tend to agree that these builds are not very common any more. If anyone reading this objects, let us know; we can always back it out or whatever. Tom