From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10751 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2012 15:10:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10740 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2012 15:10:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:10:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q76FA2lF007909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:10:02 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q76FA1XR011780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:10:02 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] DWARF frame unwinder executes one too many rows References: <1343343082-15401-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20120804123005.GA30962@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87boioktez.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120806150600.GA4772@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120806150600.GA4772@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:06:00 +0200") Message-ID: <873940kqeu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> As the discussion was about dwarf2-frame.c and you said >> I looked into the history a tiny bit. It appears I introduced this in >> revision 1.120, You left out an important part of my message: "but looking at the diff it appears I just hoisted the call to get_frame_pc out of execute_cfa_program." Tom