From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3119 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 20:44:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 3105 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2012 20:44:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:44:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADKio0F003114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:44:50 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADKin2P008730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:44:49 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] c++/13615 References: <505119AE.6040401@redhat.com> <87sja4wlqt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <506F38C2.4050107@redhat.com> <874nkzhi6p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <874nkzhi6p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:57:02 -0700") Message-ID: <87390d6xmm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 Tom> Suppose you have something like: Tom> namespace N { Tom> typedef double value_type; Tom> struct Base { typedef int value_type; }; Tom> struct Derived : public Base { }; Tom> } Keith understood what I was saying better than I did -- if you then stop in a method of Derived and 'ptype value_type', you should see int but you will see double. IIUC he's working on fixing this as part of this patch, so I'm not going to re-review it now. Tom