From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25121 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2012 20:59:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 25112 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2012 20:59:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:59:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAUKxa48026676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:59:36 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAUKxZbG004819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:59:36 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves), dje@google.com (Doug Evans), gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: handle "MiniDebuginfo" section References: <87ip8o3zfz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201211301405.qAUE5AZC014535@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201211301405.qAUE5AZC014535@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:05:09 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <8738zq24eg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00961.txt.bz2 Ulrich> If I change the above filter to also accept "D", the test case Ulrich> goes further. (It still ends up UNSUPPORTED, since it looks Ulrich> like I don't have LZMA on the system ...). I'm not sure why the Ulrich> filter for "T" is done; would it change something critical to Ulrich> the test if "D" were added? I think it would be fine. Tom