From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30701 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2012 19:39:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 30644 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2012 19:39:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:39:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBHJdGJm013997 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:39:16 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBHJdFMI001106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:39:16 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A67DE8.8040708@redhat.com> <87r4nebuzr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqwpd4hf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50C71085.1020705@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50C71085.1020705@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:52:53 +0000") Message-ID: <8738z4wjrw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00592.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> That's fine with me. Did we reach conclusion on the sys/wait.h one? Pedro> I was under the impression we'd be moving the __WCLONE define Pedro> to common/linux-ptrace.h, next to __WALL. Yeah. I had thought not, but I looked it up again just now and I see that I misread Joel's email. I'll make this change and push it. Tom