From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-117726-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1233 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2014 13:37:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 1193 invoked by uid 89); 21 Nov 2014 13:37:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:37:18 +0000
Received: from svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39])	by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp 	id 1XroOh-0001a3-16 from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:37:15 -0800
Received: from GreenOnly (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 05:37:14 -0800
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix C++ virtual method pointer resolution
References: <1411355243-10812-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>	<87k32og51t.fsf@codesourcery.com>	<CA+C-WL8r=1mW=P0PxioLgfhS8pJsXkQb7Sm7iD3q4i-i3Cyhvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:37:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CA+C-WL8r=1mW=P0PxioLgfhS8pJsXkQb7Sm7iD3q4i-i3Cyhvg@mail.gmail.com>	(Patrick Palka's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:40:41 -0500")
Message-ID: <87389cfze2.fsf@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00518.txt.bz2

Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx> writes:

>>> +get_debug_format
>>> +
>>> +if ![test_debug_format "DWARF 2"] {
>>> +    return 0
>>> +}
>>
>> Why do we need to check test_debug_format here?
>
> Because GDB only supports C++ method pointers with the DWARF debug
> format. So I'd assume that this test would fail for non-DWARF.

I am not aware of this, any details?  If GDB doesn't support C++ method
pointers with non-DWARF, we should kfail or xfail it in the test.  See
gdb.cp/m-static.exp.

--=20
Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)