Re: [PATCH] Fix invalid sigprocmask call

Pedro Alves
2017-03-24T13:37:27Z

On 03/24/2017 01:05 PM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> On 24 March 2017 at 20:55, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The standard wasn't built on a vacuum. It starts by ratifying common
>> implementation behavior. If no historical implementation behaves like what
>> you're suggesting, what's the point of enforcing that, when it's clearly
>> NOT the intent? You're just causing porting pain for no good reason.
>> Please file a bug against the standard to have the error section clarified instead.
>
> Lol, now I will consider the idea of bumping the door of POSIX committee ;)

No need. Go here:

http://austingroupbugs.net/

> I am cc-ing musl-libc list now.

Original thread here:

https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00426.html

Thanks,
Pedro Alves