From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id EpCPBOnwx2WS0RkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:55:53 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=KPt8VMM0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F2C0B1E0C3; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:55:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9962D1E092 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 16:55:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F453858C42 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708253858D35 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:54:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 708253858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 708253858D35 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707602081; cv=none; b=HFtKyzGfvU1DBQ9Uuqoyn4HSUbd9Ne8UE3veHYw1cLnTsr5T/MTV8FmRS4Zl2xmtrA1UaRV58s3sBfFYmrx74s7TrnApj7zx4zS1YO/7Q7Ce2BewojhVPMMf335bxPYanf/NQeBnmcNOdMLzaHFENP95s3qI1nv/GjIWzBjML4E= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707602081; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9jB4Xa1xmW2GZ5S4GcPzXj2eb9aPDAielOHWadIl3sA=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=E9+5tKNQ8hyiSBAbktuzqT0TZ5QFUOSLBb1SmjdMG+KbNbZEsdB9qwJPHmJeUAI3mHdQkW/QgUgB/pRoWCxh1YYYEm5aykFJcq4LSQwO2wqs0MMQm5vhfD6PGG2Y+s/7LrapMF0ktl0flsoJqlfTdYgrgodMPr5Eqktcnt6R6GM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-5003a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.159]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id Ys7NrJgfP8uLRYvJ1rSjCc; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:54:39 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id YvIzrz4J8KPn6YvJ0r3oEy; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 21:54:38 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=IM6hCRvG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65c7f09e a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=k7vzHIieQBIA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=zstS-IiYAAAA:8 a=IZuDjKPuDZNkxrV2kkEA:9 a=S_HVFEA2qnQA:10 a=4G6NA9xxw8l3yy4pmD5M:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/Wr2vLLZ+IaioiSAWi5ux7BdorH5excjdmd0+0fh0ys=; b=KPt8VMM0czB+mspAosq4hA1ZDN MKkyJQ0lRVExrhu5ExD5zgJgG3lpM6bTmDwqA7ZDExq4jchr5wSYpIj5L8WxDrYTeJRSgepnXSkAu p4G2Md6WuTstRHGauI77gEnND; Received: from [69.2.159.9] (port=5995 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rYvIz-001Fyo-21; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:54:37 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Burgess Cc: Tom Tromey , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Pass GUILE down to subdirectories" References: <20240123001928.787780-1-tom@tromey.com> <87bk8s8der.fsf@redhat.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:54:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87bk8s8der.fsf@redhat.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:09:00 +0000") Message-ID: <8734u0m1d1.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 69.2.159.9 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rYvIz-001Fyo-21 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: (prentzel) [69.2.159.9]:5995 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 3 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfOg19oZlysLtniRkNI8sKv7hno5AX60N/QfXW2lrpoNpgH+ytlyntXgnRqIetYjtFgsSylI7ykndivrdzfSfFaJIX4FNoZsiC1WGy7/yADyhhiOEvO1Y JEfxPo/DwlIvo5y55Ob9NPnaYt2lygdWG1FcqKjuraRhQ2I+gQEWZSM31FKSC1CjA3xvlmaS4vlLVOvNAOx1BxzWwaR1lfXijdY= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3016.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess writes: Andrew> Tom Tromey writes: >> This reverts commit b7e5a29602143b53267efcd9c8d5ecc78cd5a62f. >> >> This patch caused problems for some users when building gdb, because >> it would cause 'guild' to be invoked with the wrong versin of guile. >> On the whole it seems simpler to just back this out. >> >> * Makefile.in: Rebuild. >> * Makefile.tpl (BASE_EXPORTS): Remove GUILE. >> (GUILE): Remove. >> * Makefile.def (flags_to_pass): Remove GUILE. Andrew> Is it going to be possible to merge this with GCC in stage 4? Would be Andrew> super useful if we could as this is still causing problems. We can always check it in to gdb now and then to gcc at some later date. If that sounds ok to you, I'll go ahead & do it. thanks, Tom