From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id yD+wKJSyAWYdrBUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:21:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=IncTmcNO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 969A21E0C0; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:21:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292651E030 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78093858436 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:21:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DFEF3858409 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:20:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1DFEF3858409 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1DFEF3858409 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711387238; cv=none; b=cykIHCil9q1OGIMTEMQujzAzHH/bR5MpDhAWcHWyDYsFPYeDRXPRN7pi7Wnh+5Ao7o3lbqfO3/N5u/LKTW9Ts+WOOYuI1U8ifu45a/n4ghiM1saIzQYWiIBNG0t1uDYrB/rPzecFbLlLqqg6vYAUN8wZ4qn2I10+OXq1CqcZ/04= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711387238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EPrO0czgrXtCvQo9Y+xVDxJdHStgbcw7j34PYZ1f5Y0=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LMckUf01ScrVpReWHtV6QIiPW91DQxz2M+mC9dtxJOgCrO6thvqjSqZ/v2DipGt0elU9alpYG9z/eQp/nEb/GfNDSj/M447R4OuTgK3iQLxYMSlS6+fs35vt35NUkn3wQU5lxWB49XByd53Ds5+YQcTYIlxz3L5sdPVyjUxfKdk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1711387236; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=twOyEh7DqT30YAZiM7zVaA9FDUEIvA3gGqXLSGhOQVw=; b=IncTmcNO1EeY0dDY9OS79qGNyjAmNk6SZUcdG+FRrHP9wM1szsHoQF5iL8nleZ+aBi399N L5qZ1L4lUhpv6Tdvwdewcwg2kMInJmc2m5OITzpXEOjInEPyvBHnmhB9Synv+kYQ7g6vWX IhUTNtT2/msmw/b0TcBc8oykBdV2BvE= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-543-Ydcdkl0lPMyfijp5uMEHpg-1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:20:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ydcdkl0lPMyfijp5uMEHpg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d6d3815f9bso12313271fa.0 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711387232; x=1711992032; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=twOyEh7DqT30YAZiM7zVaA9FDUEIvA3gGqXLSGhOQVw=; b=XBcwK5KMtvkcxPd5xSF4Q+7FTv/6jomBFlPJeYxQXx2AR+nfEktPSr6kJfXITj8KMn HSdxWNsu8PN5H4p/QSqA/U5apvEAtlPhjba16gnVKapWN6VEd3K/n5/LSaWamOm9X6CE qUcodFN4lJeQpOWkOL+m82LTdZKaeqIJhXGleZnfzORztDFHSYRX5FG9r3lZZT0J1Jhl OhgKD486fWLTvm2WltNPRAJKMYObu/rjG374z315oZfhjimLnalOsN8NvDN0BGT6iJq/ xC/cLAFaQbymTxtUM7CPRD1wi5Vw3O2HYyLf8OsyQysZkH0v8pRSUsG67+6dfHNBDcZu CR/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzE65mQHgga0JTi8/Y0Z41uMn8fTP+vFVpNM0kFgwTA3FC1O6Bs tfftrYDG4xBT5V3dSlZz2TFSu5dh5XDJMKnC6R1P/WF209qyePRzslge9Ga7c1Du+BQN0yb6AoY xJIcy+QQmKvAiYlXw40gCQk3RvJdvoR0IfvD88laGpD+x60Cxz2OkXhtP1LlASrP4RtKT/+X1AM Z+MeG/3ZW6RDq0KC6EQdDV/jOzAxoW4jRlsLhjSCHozCY= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8055:0:b0:2d4:6bab:15eb with SMTP id p21-20020a2e8055000000b002d46bab15ebmr6437040ljg.12.1711387232340; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHhARSPBBGnw3eXpP9eDX5xcGloaDpao7mbb/Tr/ndL69x9WMkDShHGyHWuh6rhFPwMugewgg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8055:0:b0:2d4:6bab:15eb with SMTP id p21-20020a2e8055000000b002d46bab15ebmr6437019ljg.12.1711387231757; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (92.40.184.48.threembb.co.uk. [92.40.184.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rh9-20020a17090720e900b00a46d786365esm3264399ejb.94.2024.03.25.10.20.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:20:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Burgess To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: hjl.tools@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/8] x86/Linux Target Description Changes In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:20:30 +0000 Message-ID: <8734seteht.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_ABUSEAT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Andrew Burgess writes: > In v3: > > - Rebased. Nasty merge conflict with 4bb20a6244b7091 which I think > I've resolved, but am unable to test. Reposting so the author of > that other commit can validate. > > - Initial testing looks good. Full tests are still running. Testing completed with no issues. H.J. Lu confirmed that this versions didn't break the x32 behaviour. I've gone ahead and pushed these patches. If anything crops up then do let me know. Thanks, Andrew