From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28894 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2012 19:43:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28885 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2012 19:43:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SINGLE_HEADER_1K,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:43:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CJhaqt024806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:43:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CJhZjb032145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:43:35 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: oza Pawandeep Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <878vj9lo0x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F5D9DB9.2010304@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (oza Pawandeep's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:02:18 +0530") Message-ID: <871uoxppug.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 >>>>> "oza" == oza Pawandeep writes: oza> I am still unable to checkout the code. getting timeout errors. oza> any inputs ? I don't, sorry. You could perhaps email me your public key and I could check it against the key stored on sourceware. Otherwise, sourceware ssh works fine for many people, so I presume the difficulty is on your end. Tom