From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7584 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 18:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 7573 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 18:57:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:57:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KIv9ls031777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:57:10 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KIv8kB005448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:57:09 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [obv] Fix python-2.4 compilation compat. [Re: [commit] [PATCH] Allow 64-bit enum values] References: <20120418065627.GA31851@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201204191638.q3JGc7YI008735@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20120420081720.4167fb93@spoyarek> <20120420072056.GA12991@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120420072056.GA12991@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:20:56 +0200") Message-ID: <871unijkor.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00694.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Checked in. I do not think autoconf-checking is worth this case. I agree; and FWIW we have some similar workarounds elsewhere in the tree already. Tom