From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11621 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2012 15:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11612 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2012 15:32:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:32:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8RFWods009544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:32:50 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8RFWmFd002208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:32:49 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: ali_anwar Cc: Subject: Re: Updated patch for Bug 13217 - thread apply all detach throws a SEGFAULT References: <5062EA9B.1060505@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5062EA9B.1060505@codesourcery.com> (ali anwar's message of "Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:44:27 +0500") Message-ID: <871uhnwkf3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00638.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ali" == ali anwar writes: Ali> +static int Ali> +thread_valid (struct thread_info *tp) Ali> +{ Ali> + struct thread_info *utp; Ali> + for (utp = thread_list; utp; utp = utp->next) Ali> + if (tp == utp) Ali> + return 1; Ali> + return 0; Ali> +} Ali> + for (tp = thread_list; thread_valid(tp); tp = tp->next) It seems like this introduces quadratic behavior here. I think it would be better to avoid this. Ali> + if (thread_count() == 0) Ali> + break; Here too. Tom