From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-101828-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30311 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 14:04:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 30297 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2013 14:04:38 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 14:04:38 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4ME4YbT010136	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 22 May 2013 10:04:34 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-72.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.72])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4ME4Wpm008682	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Wed, 22 May 2013 10:04:32 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,        Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PR 15075 dprintf interferes with "next"
References: <1361192891-29341-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>	<8738wpd3qe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CANFwon3DymreN3ost7ZSrd0deb_sBC6YTzk1fpv8k+7d0ADnLg@mail.gmail.com>	<5176C14B.6010603@redhat.com>	<CANFwon1tTZTVcn7ieP5=HnPy+2hCKP1my-UE1-Xosp=Q6WrGug@mail.gmail.com>	<51774714.9060306@codesourcery.com>	<CANFwon2Q_=++=WbZD25Ch6qnRtpmuVBOsmkqhevyMAnM3y+ZZA@mail.gmail.com>	<CANFwon0A4wmgEuREeQHYfRWMfn_cct6dHCZ6_oFH+wVr1Wym4A@mail.gmail.com>	<51969A92.80003@redhat.com>	<CANFwon3OaNBrvw4jwv_RJ8ws+SVx9NctfTw2FSDVowaxAmgF9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:04:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CANFwon3OaNBrvw4jwv_RJ8ws+SVx9NctfTw2FSDVowaxAmgF9Q@mail.gmail.com>	(Hui Zhu's message of "Wed, 22 May 2013 18:21:55 +0800")
Message-ID: <871u8zjekw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> writes:

Hui> So I change this part to:
Hui> if { [prepare_for_testing dprintf-next.exp "dprintf-next" {} {debug}] } {
Hui>     return -1
Hui> }

I think it is better to use the variables created by standard_testfile.

Tom