From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49414 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2017 16:49:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 49333 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2017 16:48:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:48:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87F34E4C3; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:48:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com D87F34E4C3 Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=sergiodj@redhat.com Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-193.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.193]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8F86F10D; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:48:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: , , Pedro Alves , Djordje Todorovic Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ELF/BFD: Handle both variants of the 64-bit Linux core PRPSINFO note References: <878th6xj8q.fsf@redhat.com> <87k20nwu42.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:48:37 +0100") Message-ID: <871smulo5m.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-09/txt/msg00758.txt.bz2 On Monday, September 25 2017, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> Sure, thanks for explaining. I understand it's a matter of taste and as >> I said, it's really a nitpick. I still think the patch is good as is >> and a nice improvement to the current situation. > > FAOD, among `prpsinfo32_ugid16', `prpsinfo32_ugid32', `prpsinfo64_ugid16' > and `prpsinfo64_ugid32' what order did you have in mind? Actually, I gave it a thought and I agree with the way you organized it. The ordering makes total sense to me now. Thanks, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/