From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123804 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2019 20:10:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123652 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2019 20:10:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*Ad:U*tom X-HELO: gateway32.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway32.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway32.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.145.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:10:49 +0000 Received: from cm12.websitewelcome.com (cm12.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.8]) by gateway32.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9662B2C408 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:10:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id aQcxhr6P7iQeraQcxhPKb1; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:10:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=F4A+CSjqd8Q50yP+dOJu2tbq8B3Z5/x1ZqjNd72L9uo=; b=mXs/z80cJXwMM9QD4/RD5Iajis I7bUPEaO5o7/oikapzm6VDrCxo+E2bSX1ircyQUvrn9uUzNGZ9kLmNp+1FY3zhoQ9O7CUzj6/FBn5 kZO9Bwj2o8N5XySMDdzAXmSwG; Received: from 174-29-48-168.hlrn.qwest.net ([174.29.48.168]:54576 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1haQcx-001xzw-CO; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:10:47 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Philippe Waroquiers Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFAv2 1/3] Implement 'set print frame-info|frame-arguments presence'. References: <20190511185603.17231-1-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <20190511185603.17231-2-philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> <878suhl1hh.fsf@tromey.com> <1560170884.22517.6.camel@skynet.be> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 20:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1560170884.22517.6.camel@skynet.be> (Philippe Waroquiers's message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:48:04 +0200") Message-ID: <871s0119rt.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-06/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Philippe" == Philippe Waroquiers writes: >> Is this a pre-existing bug? It seems like something we should change, >> since my believe is that "no filters" should produce the same output as >> the situation where there are actually no filters installed. Philippe> Yes, it is a pre-existing "bug", but the difference of behaviour is Philippe> between 'bt' and 'bt no-filters' *when there are some filters*. [...] Philippe> This difference of behaviour will be visible as long as there is Philippe> one filter active, even if the filter is a 'no effect' filter. Philippe> So, the question is: do we want to change the default output behaviour Philippe> of python frame filters to be LOCATION ? Philippe> That is of course a user visible change. Yes, I think this ought to change. Installing a "no effect" filter should not have any effect on the output. Tom