From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22799 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2020 19:18:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22790 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2020 19:18:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:721 X-HELO: gateway22.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway22.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway22.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.47.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:18:06 +0000 Received: from cm10.websitewelcome.com (cm10.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.4]) by gateway22.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603CE9C75 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:18:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id 4UrBj9HbvEfyq4UrBjH3Zl; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:18:01 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LA/PNGDlBZeu7dZf0qNurJe3Rvly0z61aNC4PwhvjtE=; b=ctRDVK0r8bUr+UyF6SEcNGfERZ VnY+kqMmvaskTHlniomC3NISRIsRUq6CgFuhM5dXT6l5DVsAGU2fWYOS2Jjr5uqBg9m7teX+fr7pF 4iZ2MQoUNilfxvTeDQNduzY6d; Received: from 75-166-123-50.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.123.50]:54052 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j4UrB-001agf-54; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 12:18:01 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change gdbserver to use existing gdbsupport References: <20200219170643.10725-1-tom@tromey.com> <48984f7d-f851-84c8-1145-95fbfbbade23@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 19:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <48984f7d-f851-84c8-1145-95fbfbbade23@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:42:05 +0000") Message-ID: <871rqqwfmf.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00791.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I'm surprised you didn't hit any problem, because last time we chatted Pedro> about it, I quickly tried it, and ran into a small number of places Pedro> that needed adjustment. Yeah, I'm surprised too. I just tried a mingw build and it found some issues. So, I will redo it. Pedro> I'd prefer to see this conversion in two separate patches. One (or more) that Pedro> removes the bfd dependency from gdb's gdbsupport, which potentially is a material Pedro> change for making GDB always use 64-bit types, and then a separate change Pedro> to make gdbserver use top level gdbsupport. Will do. Tom