Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Simon Farre via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Simon Farre <simon.farre.cx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/DAP: Add customRequest
Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 15:19:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qjr6dr5.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230507094144.894866-1-simon.farre.cx@gmail.com> (Simon Farre via Gdb-patches's message of "Sun, 7 May 2023 11:41:44 +0200")

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Farre via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Simon> This patch introduces the customRequest, which allows for DA's (debug adapters)
Simon> that want to use the full extent of GDB's functionality by working a bit
Simon> like the extension of `gdb.Command`

Seems reasonable to me.

Simon> Unfortunately, there's nothing about such a request in the
Simon> DAP-spec, but I'd argue that's really irrelevant; the largest
Simon> code editor for debug adapter protocol implementers, has a notion
Simon> of it, though it's up to DA-implementers to make sure they
Simon> understand their own requests.

Makes sense.

Simon> Beyond this patch, documentation would be needed also, to document how
Simon> to create customRequests, like the one above. I'm hoping Eli can provide me with
Simon> some direction here.

There's a DAP node in the docs where I think it would make sense to
document the existence of the custom request.  For implementing requests
themselves, I think a new node in python.texi would be appropriate.

>> @server.custom_request("foo")
>> def fooRequestHandler(argumentBaz):
>> # full Python interpreter access, full access to all of GDB, like we're @ the CLI
>> # say goodbye to MI! Yay! :P
>> return { "bar": gdb.execute("print foo", to_string=True), "someParam": argumentBaz }

Simon> +@request("customRequest")
Simon> +def custom_request_handler(**args):
Simon> +    global _custom_requests
Simon> +    cmd = args["command"]
Simon> +    if _custom_requests.get(cmd) is not None:
Simon> +        return _custom_requests[cmd](args["args"])

An issue here is that the DAP thread can't directly invoke code in gdb
-- basically the 'gdb' module is off-limits.  This is why there are
decorators to assert that a given function is on the DAP thread or gdb
thread.  This rule is in place because the core of gdb isn't
thread-safe.

Probably the fix is as simple as wrapping the call with
send_gdb_with_response, and having the custom_request decorator
use in_gdb_thread.

Tom

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-07 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-07  9:41 Simon Farre via Gdb-patches
2023-05-07 10:45 ` Matt Rice via Gdb-patches
2023-05-07 21:19 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2023-05-10  9:40 ` Lancelot SIX via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871qjr6dr5.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.farre.cx@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox