From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QjN7Cc8C9WkigwkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 May 2026 15:45:19 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Qa6RI31w; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1563E1E067; Fri, 01 May 2026 15:45:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7EB1E067 for ; Fri, 01 May 2026 15:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFC94A968F9 for ; Fri, 1 May 2026 19:45:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CEFC94A968F9 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Qa6RI31w Received: from omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta040.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.39]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ECA34AA0974 for ; Fri, 1 May 2026 19:44:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3ECA34AA0974 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3ECA34AA0974 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.39 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1777664693; cv=none; b=sYFQ30gzClX+I2j+k6d2ISdNHYvpRdjXzf3UFSi4/PhOhw1MPOozISi2zpERnnX0FxjG0mNLeb6TG5MoMRYyBh/D8Dr4nvHwoln1LInpy6pinSPrjPqaWCFZkpQ+RnP3bAqv33VcI8kMuoWHkqaLRR1m4UaO5I5pDJ8P5JVv/qc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1777664693; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VVZF5v9n/Jv1oqZoRT95n1UVrVZdKpuh9skWvQeGopI=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=N1oB+2VDIyimJl3qhu+buTImrk2Lp5WU3sQIp/PN30JFXxGAd+24T0vLV6ML2Ql97dF00KB9miQc0D8YYjlBQ/bg9i/zEl91th+oTr/FAgh7pBxuVIEW5zWroTH8w8sQs7dYT6Ca7RqjNDZBXH1hLXEXJEVQLKsnpcu0K+sAZz0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3ECA34AA0974 Received: from eig-obgw-6001b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.143]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id IkfFwB5Us4RkpItnAwoy6X; Fri, 01 May 2026 19:44:52 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id ItnAwccJEZYPjItnAwagI5; Fri, 01 May 2026 19:44:52 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=HbMUTjE8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69f502b4 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=NGcC8JguVDcA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=X-_63gfYdPL_jDPrvxAA:9 a=DCx65vhANUyCzuf5D8fC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2pBlV6YeOb2M3/x+zE0lUnTcNkbNGoDQ4qm0yTGyyUY=; b=Qa6RI31w8ynLp+dJLLluZ8lsVd WBZHSix7XLjYn5OpvHaXNCjjEfkPivyN6ExV8i1H4B5L/r+DCgBD/OJxgO0H/xkCp6voNpineg9BL U9UbkI9Xw+RWkTgNSL1HZmZBj; Received: from 75-166-225-82.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.225.82]:43494 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wItnA-00000004JGL-1AVb; Fri, 01 May 2026 13:44:51 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] [gdb/exp] Fix ignoring of incorrect namespace prefix In-Reply-To: <20260419081236.570600-3-tdevries@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Sun, 19 Apr 2026 10:12:35 +0200") References: <20260419081236.570600-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20260419081236.570600-3-tdevries@suse.de> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 13:44:50 -0600 Message-ID: <871pfuhq31.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.225.82 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1wItnA-00000004JGL-1AVb X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-225-82.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [75.166.225.82]:43494 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 6 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfN4Y5XS1Zi7wPvbr140REKHzyga7/5SI3UVkttGspikfeDdA2KRJnmY42v8KqlYqvYwRwt2eCgKqPQGv9OkEKhnOtz40EGrkTOe1D714qvY/20kBdOzS 9nb7TAwe+WiN3oE/GbF9ABHnXJIJC0DFK6IFbXnaXHHDv9nsNRvrHp1fqvfjS0EQr3tSNFywbwAEMI80I9oR+OrsVokqS+fvfGM= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries writes: Tom> + const char *current_scope = (block->function_block () != nullptr Tom> + ? block->scope () Tom> + : nullptr /* Don't know. */); Calling block::scope would yield "" even for the static block case. So I was wondering why not use that rather than check function_block? But like I said elsewhere, I don't really follow this function that well. thanks, Tom