From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id W8hEEyWjPmpdaxkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:04:53 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OGQaD1Pu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 343891E098; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:04:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797A11E024 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:04:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC064BA2E28 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:04:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5FC064BA2E28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OGQaD1Pu Received: from omta38.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta38.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.89.44.37]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 785004BA2E1A for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:04:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 785004BA2E1A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 785004BA2E1A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=35.89.44.37 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1782489865; cv=none; b=LEALk9TUbCMcjLQG7SU6omW2lcAAn6ZF+jtlXhyhwjnaGnOjUmh5YeEKw1su7z+a3lgay9MYEj+HMh6JG7dMM7U6LU/OjquGDhTpGfP4aecuEBWqT5Jj8n8XwhLBcl9vnxZ8pfAGHOI8OV02G7vK4ed0Fuo6vk5YNdsTa0Szb8w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1782489865; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qNO4rSDU6+/0d8MKo5S4dD1OmJemtWX17pcm7C/cQzc=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=VIRpRgV2Gi5+TGT2CYfP/eYmIHSoBxPEL2VgQKRh5KNwQnyCGngyAoFfXMPix0iyjIAGy1NEpuQH/+qmzIu6EAfAUtH0/d4t8PYqsP3CRbyD/5hVXOHpVlMCcQLBnQRWJSkAcNR+gMXJ5SzbKsnipvQ6pC7Oon8aVkYPsfi7K5Q= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; sourceware.org; dkim=policy (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OGQaD1Pu reason="signing key too small" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 785004BA2E1A Received: from eig-obgw-5002b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.226]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id d8yJwxvuiMFEgd92WwrKOU; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:04:24 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id d92VwwBm0Ev27d92VwmPBI; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:04:24 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=V9590fni c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6a3ea308 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=FelO9ux0wxsA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=hJGAnfxRQnzU3t0IklkA:9 a=DCx65vhANUyCzuf5D8fC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/s21JJCPUCv1wJYCxMi4Qd/bB1PtAQs1X9riEcKgIkg=; b=OGQaD1PuT3E8rLBUAXl+npTC0n rk6jGdi/sl3of4w8nm2Qb1q0LKsyQwBOBwlyjchZfUOHdyP5Lv5pJ+2YWM8XOlpFrIXy8fD75nehy ZGhGKFk0Wo6ZrAr08snR5ffg6; Received: from 75-166-225-82.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.225.82]:49444 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.99.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wd92V-00000001BnQ-1Akj; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:04:23 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] [gdb] Convert typedef of named struct In-Reply-To: <20260616062257.3164438-10-tdevries@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:22:54 +0200") References: <20260616062257.3164438-1-tdevries@suse.de> <20260616062257.3164438-10-tdevries@suse.de> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:04:22 -0600 Message-ID: <871pdtwant.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.225.82 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1wd92V-00000001BnQ-1Akj X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-225-82.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [75.166.225.82]:49444 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfO48QI61zVt2nWsfCJSE0w3bSH20pRnBx6paHHa2Ua/fNYvrelcg/2zIW85eeCf9GIBu/WzkW2K9EMyQ36WnPmrABV9DkVDiBClDNfndlltQz68fCwyn iDSHpbnRMQwyzNE7Ug6GOsFfeFAtGVNtagS0bySWM3uoXMwgDsu4gU3ZOllo3kJJaStCWOsztTpk6DBNXnWCF5dUrm4twZH5FHM= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries writes: Tom> Convert "typedef struct foo { ... } bar" to "using bar = struct foo { ...}". This seems mostly fine FWIW. In the future we should probably just not allow types to have two names like this. There's really no benefit to it. Tom> gdb/stubs/m68k-stub.c | 4 ++-- I believe the stubs are just plain C code and so transforming those isn't correct. Tom