From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92381 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2016 13:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92367 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2016 13:41:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:209.85.192.193, Hx-spam-relays-external:209.85.192.193, H*r:sk:42.2016, furniture X-HELO: mail-pf0-f193.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f193.google.com) (209.85.192.193) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:41:00 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f193.google.com with SMTP id 65so3638765pfd.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:41:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.98.68.132 with SMTP id m4mr26090822pfi.79.1452519659069; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xz6sm186132250pab.42.2016.01.11.05.40.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:40:58 -0800 (PST) From: Yao Qi To: Antoine Tremblay Cc: Yao Qi , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support tracepoints for ARM linux in GDBServer References: <1452188697-23870-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> <867fjgwbsh.fsf@gmail.com> <5693A681.4030807@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5693A681.4030807@ericsson.com> (Antoine Tremblay's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:56:33 -0500") Message-ID: <86ziwcutct.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 Antoine Tremblay writes: >> Hi Antoine, >> First of all, thanks for patches. I am afraid can't review them soon >> because 1) I find there are some places in arm software single step code >> can be improved, so I'd like to clean the room first before we move in >> new furniture, > Can I help with that ? Maybe it would free you some time for 2) ? > Thanks for your offer. Most of my patches are done in my tree, but I need to polish them, and figure out some better solutions. >> 2) I have to fix AArch64 and ARM test fails before 7.11 >> branch/release. I'll review them after I finish them above, if nobody >> reviews them yet. >> > > OK. I wish I could get these features in for 7.11 too. > It's not too ARM specific at least, so it's good that you're OK with > another reviewer pitching in. > > I hope it all works out for 7.11. Yes, it is good to ship it in 7.11, but it isn't a must for 7.11, IMO. I don't mind that ARM linux tracepiont isn't in 7.11 release. I'd like to make these existing features working properly, and then look at the new things. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)