From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58615 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2016 15:56:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 58529 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2016 15:56:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=gdbtesters, gdb-testers X-HELO: mail-pf0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-pf0-f170.google.com) (209.85.192.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:56:23 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 184so47188307pff.0 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:56:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hvqFinZyHaXXKx5bV40QeQePDjeoDZi3T5hVoeff9gM=; b=BR35KgSbFaEMAY9BcBGGMaeFG89toAgFgpXXIfKUKjkwMxwR58cjdESMCIm9COnXPT SjAra0k0+l9gSIJO7fZnrOMonM9DroyFJKeZvlKIklgeyk2eyOy7A9u8Unlk7gMj6i0n NgjuAA3B2X9mT2jiFu45KWPzCwoSFSbyUjkdIsaRybNysD2il14vYeA1Hk5FC6Zc6Lar cr/dnc9CF92is+rBt0vxof6xeiekNFhwdsiFpEONNWfoIYEquVG4VdUQ51rLnQA/bHDe D756BmZ+uM3oZ/sW3fj72pIRpx81clReAG4Elaw3gaKmXVBbzzT5E3Lw4Y2TQLdAMrhD xj2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLuUJIY+K8TzYq27JocXOvmdZbbKy62szyAsb8ZvyD5d62bVRA2dA4G+LpSswXdNw== X-Received: by 10.98.71.70 with SMTP id u67mr21972750pfa.85.1459785381970; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kl14sm1288120pab.23.2016.04.04.08.56.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:56:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: palves@redhat.com, Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Break at each iteration for breakpoints placed on a while statement References: <20150818235334.1afb0c85@pinnacle.lan> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150818235334.1afb0c85@pinnacle.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:53:34 -0700") Message-ID: <86zit9nzac.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 Kevin Buettner writes: > This patch set changes the current behavior of breakpoints placed on > while loops. (It actually restores past behavior; see below.) Hi Pedro, your recent change https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00462.h= tml triggers a test failure in gdb.base/jit.exp on arm-linux that breakpoint on the loop "WAIT_FOR_GDB" isn't hit. The problem is also found by buildbot, https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-testers/2016-q1/msg10203.html The problem is what this patch series is trying to fix, so I think we do need this patch series. Do you plan to review them? (I ask you this because you gave comments to one of these patches) or I can review them if you don't have cycles. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)