From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19894 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2017 13:24:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19791 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2017 13:24:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:static. X-HELO: mail-io0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f171.google.com) (209.85.223.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:24:35 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id g35so5825767ioi.3 for ; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 06:24:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kYQTG0P0JGDaeAqg4huEeL7aUTAcYxwUMkKDVuemjc=; b=ZR+4BFla6fuD/uNPyVB7LXpJMI5cjvri9L1NewdQ+l0SLyBlEHWX3LIvyF4Ktl/pgO eI2q7U2T4NKEJIsDQ5CG4WDSLatKHGKjk8EMDSfueuaRZH6rmT3ZHkgU0W8XgiYa+RFh ajER8EfZI+bYVllAH1Bf2AB5E2Afiscs3olWiF5qPRXd7hwPwra8f1jGBLiJOuU26zm0 DinxceUauSKapaBzHDpwYizYl9/z5OiENGxdUKev0ly8cLpaC6BjlQhBZM1IjlymEnH7 vf2mEGsZ/cG2QNQ5KHFHl3Yt30+cCfOkJwKVd1tN6uuLugd1oD4hReUD7tUN5NtlqJrp YIcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5i/6BIC2xyb1VSuIf/9RQhn9UA2epVlbj3EGag7Vc1hhdTNbYhj uLfqjKu4OFHOehOW X-Received: by 10.107.19.89 with SMTP id b86mr2475869ioj.4.1501853074229; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 06:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (static.42.136.251.148.clients.your-server.de. [148.251.136.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i133sm701881ioi.31.2017.08.04.06.24.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 06:24:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: , Yao Qi , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: [PATCH] mem-break: Fix breakpoint insertion location References: Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 13:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2017 17:36:53 +0100") Message-ID: <86zibf1n5e.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 "Maciej W. Rozycki" writes: > Fix a commit cd6c3b4ffc4e ("New gdbarch methods breakpoint_kind_from_pc=20 > and sw_breakpoint_from_kind") regression and restore the use of=20 > ->placed_size rather than ->reqstd_address as the location for a memory=20 s/placed_size/placed_address/ The patch looks good to me, but please give me two or three days to run the tests on an armv7 board. The board is being used for other tests, and I'll start the regression test on Monday next week. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)