From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111421 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2017 07:49:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 111079 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2017 07:49:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=alongside, H*r:sk:static. X-HELO: mail-it0-f54.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f54.google.com) (209.85.214.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:48:59 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m68so55956265ith.1 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:48:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WBfGNGw1U/xnzTG1zGgeHJQ+KNFMAjSbZt5eR0fd7mc=; b=PV9ms+ZLTEKtZD/htS2FnqeS1s0jvWNEvjLIJwYp/gfUjD7YE4L87SdalY4+jlMtpA mYe1/u+yCnVL8+3mEQhynB6RCee4n7y4FUQ/9+XZsa2KI8KdmE2hnE5gWtQQpS999HQV r9qb+sSnOZJXWDnvtPVkITQl4NyehA/7eJC+ypZD5DYKUbkQYM6Npjzs1GmDp/KBsCpE Dh70DqHTh8KERDIeIfxtLiA6/U3PxRTDWszAjSxiH+HvtaAYTeqIGiruEn7LnG4LBPRz iPn+gvYTh5dc60/Wh65hHYkaasdsEL+uDv8aom6SfF69t4/sS+hkeiu84PbpwjLAadng Oatg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1110mIcL+1On7xpTsEHrAfnfxjrBklkUO2HcbGy38j6EG/pRSsWt RaQpaOPt5m0C1wQG X-Received: by 10.107.44.2 with SMTP id s2mr8335406ios.187.1499759321482; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (static.42.136.251.148.clients.your-server.de. [148.251.136.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k12sm511427itk.29.2017.07.11.00.48.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:48:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: John Baldwin Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support fs_base and gs_base for native FreeBSD/amd64 References: <20170627224948.99138-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20170627224948.99138-1-jhb@FreeBSD.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:49:46 -0700") Message-ID: <86wp7fqur3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 John Baldwin writes: > On the other hand, I wonder if we shouldn't just add fs_base and gs_base > to the "core" descriptions alongside "fs" and "gs" rather than using a > separate feature if they are always going to be present. The feature org.gnu.gdb.i386.core and org.gnu.gdb.i386.segments are already explicitly documented https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/i386-Features.html I don't think we can modify org.gnu.gdb.i386.core. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)