From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wp21p2uw.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205122859.2919-2-prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Philipp Rudo's message of "Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:28:49 +0100")
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> - /* Find a candidate among extant architectures. */
> - for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
> - arches != NULL;
> - arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))
> - {
> - tdep = gdbarch_tdep (arches->gdbarch);
> - if (!tdep)
> - continue;
> - if (tdep->abi != tdep_abi)
> - continue;
> - if (tdep->vector_abi != vector_abi)
> - continue;
Is it possible that we have two instances of gdbarch, with the same
target description, but different vector_abi? Two different executables
compiled with different vector abis, and GDB can debug them together
(multi-process debugging. If we consider multi-target debugging in the
future, these two executable can from different targets).
> - if ((tdep->gpr_full_regnum != -1) != have_upper)
> - continue;
> - if (tdep->have_gs != have_gs)
> - continue;
> - if (tdesc_data != NULL)
> - tdesc_data_cleanup (tdesc_data);
> - return arches->gdbarch;
> - }
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 12:29 [PATCH v2 00/11] Split up s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] s390: Move tdesc validation to separate function Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] s390: Clean up s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] s390: Allocate gdbarch & tdep at start of gdbarch init Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep add field tdesc Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] s390: Add comments to uncommented functions in s390-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] s390: Add comments to uncommented functions in s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 16:16 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2017-12-06 9:56 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-06 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch@init Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-07 9:18 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-07 9:59 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep.have_* int -> bool Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] s390: Hook s390 into OSABI mechanism Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 13:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-05 17:06 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 17:44 ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-06 11:39 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] s390: if -> gdb_assert for tdesc_has_registers check Philipp Rudo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86wp21p2uw.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox