Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	 Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	 Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wp21p2uw.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205122859.2919-2-prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Philipp Rudo's	message of "Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:28:49 +0100")

Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> -  /* Find a candidate among extant architectures.  */
> -  for (arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
> -       arches != NULL;
> -       arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches->next, &info))
> -    {
> -      tdep = gdbarch_tdep (arches->gdbarch);
> -      if (!tdep)
> -	continue;
> -      if (tdep->abi != tdep_abi)
> -	continue;
> -      if (tdep->vector_abi != vector_abi)
> -	continue;

Is it possible that we have two instances of gdbarch, with the same
target description, but different vector_abi?  Two different executables
compiled with different vector abis, and GDB can debug them together
(multi-process debugging.  If we consider multi-target debugging in the
future, these two executable can from different targets).

> -      if ((tdep->gpr_full_regnum != -1) != have_upper)
> -	continue;
> -      if (tdep->have_gs != have_gs)
> -	continue;
> -      if (tdesc_data != NULL)
> -	tdesc_data_cleanup (tdesc_data);
> -      return arches->gdbarch;
> -    }

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-05 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-05 12:29 [PATCH v2 00/11] Split up s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] s390: Move tdesc validation to separate function Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] s390: Clean up s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] s390: Allocate gdbarch & tdep at start of gdbarch init Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep add field tdesc Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] s390: Add comments to uncommented functions in s390-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] s390: Add comments to uncommented functions in s390-linux-tdep.c Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch at init Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 16:16   ` Yao Qi [this message]
2017-12-06  9:56     ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-06 10:28       ` [PATCH v2 01/11] s390: Remove duplicate checks for cached gdbarch@init Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-07  9:18         ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-07  9:59           ` Yao Qi
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] s390: gdbarch_tdep.have_* int -> bool Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] s390: Hook s390 into OSABI mechanism Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 13:21   ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-05 17:06     ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 17:44       ` Ulrich Weigand
2017-12-06 11:39         ` Philipp Rudo
2017-12-05 12:29 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] s390: if -> gdb_assert for tdesc_has_registers check Philipp Rudo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86wp21p2uw.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox