From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +NC5IoiaSWjeuAkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:02:32 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=gBOyRNSn; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 897401E11F; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:02:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID, BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2819F1E089 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A91385781B for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:02:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1A91385781B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=gBOyRNSn Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9F53858D20 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:02:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AB9F53858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org AB9F53858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749654120; cv=none; b=gb/o4af4gWLOupBOZ56lA2m8SPZ6aikAPXDCXYu8qZRcXtlSpn6zcpz/AZOndCZKds+GDSFsKhQXnjh2yq6POTD+6szbplys3lWhmbO/JGTDax0B2Krw+/2A+9NydXBX3lF0s3KSuTxVMgujKS4nU9igdiMpD3CSNh6dn+e2djA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749654120; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BNgoarBF+goKmR1Yj8fmsapTHEZGL65FIIHEctFL/Lw=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=LxfkWJUsvsSm8omRBIS0k2UCj0BJrsKBsTdug+OQx5hPsNYgXjKtkknBjtxOPPSZWDTvKlLB8H2nOfAgLsEYw688w8qBql+E0PygAqp+7Ana4ET0YRzpkT9+iaI/3gjzISbd2Y72ucBvZW4NIJFXYBT8hQYNSc6nx+ge+DybQtg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AB9F53858D20 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uPMxk-000671-5d; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 11:02:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=niw0h4NnTEIWXKs3HDLIuJhZ7xmB5Sg9OfTBely26mw=; b=gBOyRNSn3D9j CV6P7eZRyvjbaFUChgpTmOxflxHT0SzP84YPdt/KE8qqIw7RoghxVpjXmTwmpwoY3gNTNix9YToam EScLkL7BWdBo/gMs/BlU3CBWUNw9VqACUQLAnwS1cJlK7BS6y536JVtpgRH3jsyDUTMCFjblditGo I2wwI3wL8y58Nc327h0uZKyAbqWSySEcfJXc1bU/0eoGortTjCVe17lQe2C0QbcK00r0nUkAJgezD Bcd8TFrFkIFn30DWOAgYiVv7vhY3KCB7eJW/REN5GNfkwlwdie1u6PZFS66sqVvIBiYtaEbjjy+nS Mc9/6F4OAzfAtRam0+PepA==; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:01:58 +0300 Message-Id: <86sek6gw49.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi Cc: tromey@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <5ddb04dd-7e7e-4aa8-8db8-2d3baac169d8@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:33:56 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Allow check-mark to be changed for CLI References: <20250611-emoji-check-mark-v2-0-d299ec101650@adacore.com> <20250611-emoji-check-mark-v2-2-d299ec101650@adacore.com> <5ddb04dd-7e7e-4aa8-8db8-2d3baac169d8@simark.ca> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:33:56 -0400 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > From: Simon Marchi > > I have not read all the discussions about the choice of the character, > but I just wanted to report that out of the box, this doesn't look very > good for me (the width of a checkmark isn't equal to the width of a > character). See attached `checkmark.png`. That's because this emoji (as many others) is a wide character and takes 2 columns on display, and GDB evidently doesn't take that into account in this table-like display. > Are we allowed to nitpick / bikeshed on the choice of character? My > preference would be for something a bit more subtle, like an arrow that > points to the selected thing. See `arrow.png`, which uses U+27A4. I > find it stylish, and at least on my setup, the width is correct. An arrow is not a check-mark, though.