From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, omair.javaid@linaro.org,
yao.qi@linaro.org, peter.griffin@linaro.org,
arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 9/9] Add S390 support for linux-kernel target
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86poe0nmfx.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170612193900.234bc540@ThinkPad> (Philipp Rudo's message of "Mon, 12 Jun 2017 19:39:00 +0200")
Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> +/* S390s kernel stack is split up on several memory locations:
> +
> + - kernel stack (per task)
> + - async aka. interrupt stack (per cpu)
> + - panic stack (per cpu)
> + - restart stack (unique, global)
> +
> + Each memory location is page aligned and has a size of four consecutive
> + pages (except the panic stack with only one page). */
> +
> +enum s390_lk_stack_location
> +{
> + S390_LK_STACK_INVALID = -1,
> + S390_LK_STACK_USER,
> + S390_LK_STACK_KERNEL,
> + S390_LK_STACK_ASYNC,
> + S390_LK_STACK_PANIC,
> + S390_LK_STACK_RESTART
> +};
> +
Did you consider adding different frame unwinders for frames on
different memory locations? Your patches only adds two, but IMO, we
need more unwinders for different frames,
> +
> +/* Helper macro for s390_lk_get_stack_location to check for stacks which
> + locations are stored in the lowcore.
> +
> + _addr address to be checked for
> + _lc address of the corresponding lowcore
> + _stack field name of stack in lowcore
> + _type type to be returned if _addr is on _stack
> + _size size of _stack
> +*/
> +
> +#define s390_lk_check_lowcore_stack(_addr, _lc, _stack, _type, _size) \
> + do \
> + { \
> + CORE_ADDR _##_stack, _##_stack##_top, _##_stack##_bottom; \
> + _##_stack = lk_read_addr ((_lc) + LK_OFFSET (lowcore, _stack)); \
> + _##_stack##_top = S390_LK_ROUNDUP (_##_stack, S390_LK_PAGESIZE); \
> + _##_stack##_bottom = _##_stack##_top - (_size); \
> + if ((_addr) <= _##_stack##_top && (_addr) >= _##_stack##_bottom) \
> + return (_type); \
> + } \
> + while (0)
> +
> +/* Find and return the stack location of ADDR belonging to TASK. */
> +
> +static enum s390_lk_stack_location
> +s390_lk_get_stack_location (CORE_ADDR task, CORE_ADDR addr)
> +{
> + CORE_ADDR lowcore, top, bottom;
> + unsigned int cpu = lk_task_running (task);
> +
> +
> + /* Kernel stack. */
> + bottom = lk_read_addr (task + LK_OFFSET (task_struct, stack));
> + top = bottom + S390_LK_STACKSIZE;
> + if (addr <= top && addr >= bottom)
> + return S390_LK_STACK_KERNEL;
> +
> + /* A sleeping task only has the kernel stack. If a sleeping task reaches
> + this point ADDR isn't on the stack. */
> + if (cpu == LK_CPU_INVAL)
> + return S390_LK_STACK_INVALID;
> +
> + lowcore = s390_lk_get_lowcore (cpu);
> +
> + /* Async aka. interrupt stack. */
> + s390_lk_check_lowcore_stack (addr, lowcore, async_stack,
> + S390_LK_STACK_ASYNC, S390_LK_ASYNCSIZE);
> +
> + /* Panic stack.
> + Note: The panic stack only has a size of one page. */
> + s390_lk_check_lowcore_stack (addr, lowcore, panic_stack,
> + S390_LK_STACK_PANIC, S390_LK_PAGESIZE);
> +
> + /* Restart stack. */
> + s390_lk_check_lowcore_stack (addr, lowcore, restart_stack,
> + S390_LK_STACK_RESTART, S390_LK_ASYNCSIZE);
> +
> + return S390_LK_STACK_INVALID;
> +}
The unwinders for different frames should be chained in this order.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-12 17:08 [RFC v4 0/9] Support for Linux kernel debugging Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 2/9] Add libiberty/concat styled concat_path function Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 4/9] Add kernel module support for linux-kernel target Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 7/9] Add privileged registers for s390x Philipp Rudo
2017-06-19 13:34 ` Yao Qi
2017-06-19 15:46 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 1/9] Convert substitute_path_component to C++ Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 3/9] Add basic Linux kernel support Philipp Rudo
2017-06-15 15:23 ` Yao Qi
2017-06-16 10:10 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-16 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2017-06-19 7:56 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-19 9:52 ` Yao Qi
2017-06-19 13:35 ` Omair Javaid
2017-06-19 15:44 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 5/9] Add commands for linux-kernel target Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:08 ` [RFC v4 8/9] Link frame_info to thread_info Philipp Rudo
2017-06-19 13:07 ` Yao Qi
2017-06-19 15:46 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:09 ` [RFC v4 6/9] Separate common s390-tdep.* from s390-linux-tdep.* Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 17:39 ` [RFC v4 9/9] Add S390 support for linux-kernel target Philipp Rudo
2017-06-19 13:20 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2017-06-19 15:45 ` Philipp Rudo
2017-06-12 21:17 ` Philipp Rudo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86poe0nmfx.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=omair.javaid@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yao.qi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox