From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8aizDdQq3mllxxYAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:53:56 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=bQAmnshP; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 33C941E08C; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:53:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E1A1E08C for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C514BA23CF for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:53:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2C514BA23CF Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=bQAmnshP Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D1194BA2E07 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:53:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2D1194BA2E07 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2D1194BA2E07 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776167609; cv=none; b=OrcXUw4fZWzng2RV7IgjuTxCM0w0c5SnXrhNjE48ISxGhzSjwiXg6u2LxGG2MxCA8einJV77PQFhG5LovokyVZwJWNAqWaWHS9GvT4CXCl6JNj7TsJn8M2RQdUYTisPKY/0kBS91qhVzgdgAzTwuwwB/2lXPQmMmE1U2ImOFf3g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1776167609; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n/i1GDN0jTAm09s8TsAvgW6GPSAZYtKnIF0VF9iSSAg=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=eCrYtOFC9atFPRsUjDzd3jLbZFZSUY67gMdPKQbeeHuYaDDu06lfX13WdQh9zCua3X6y5nAufhnyYFOybutahW4TmbTl2ozWewaK0/UzS8V0lo5yckkrdA7KXg+tKGbrH+EnAGiTUfiO2J4C7lVoZjH1k26d86foEsA6DttZUFU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D1194BA2E07 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wCcKe-00024T-2o; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:53:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=H2gpJDmo6topJ8zkT/8eyUGDQsTBQ+oC1BHm4IsHqO0=; b=bQAmnshPWJOv xexlXHFKgfB6pXhD442wvXM3JRgSDjZI8LSy+BMZXNwZOFHSnJzMo1qYhzuL8BugFNwBwD9KGFiKa DRTO0Y7UWhjUUmySxcWv2YEg2xbvKNS9ZHrsnoPUjzwygth28Al8vVLGcPKxadSBgcpE3RIH2EbnS 8sZjP4YE0j2t+zZVIO9hdYA2CCYpF4uAL0Ectik+uSPPgw7hhJmM16Qhe3N4/1yd67PmaAIFoj68/ qShy/cNecqeG1WrTnAvWQHrNzSpBnV427KuPwO4tKFr3ZzedwEQfRrWxBO2mbp2WjcrBc9OkVOeqc LYul5VDlCwushMsZG/w5Ew==; Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 14:53:26 +0300 Message-Id: <86o6jloj0p.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Schimpe, Christina" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, thiago.bauermann@linaro.org In-Reply-To: (christina.schimpe@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] gdb: Add command option 'bt -shadow' to print the shadow stack backtrace. References: <20260123080532.878738-1-christina.schimpe@intel.com> <20260123080532.878738-7-christina.schimpe@intel.com> <86a4y4iudm.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > From: "Schimpe, Christina" > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , > "thiago.bauermann@linaro.org" > Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:43:52 +0000 > > I just noticed the following warnings on fedora with texinfo 7.2: > > gdb.texinfo:26867: warning: node next pointer for `AArch64' is `x86' but next is `GCS' in menu > gdb.texinfo:27232: warning: node `x86' is next for `GCS' in menu but not in sectioning > gdb.texinfo:27232: warning: node `AArch64' is prev for `GCS' in menu but not in sectioning > gdb.texinfo:27232: warning: node up pointer for `GCS' is `AArch64' but up is `Architectures' in menu > gdb.texinfo:27280: warning: node next pointer for `x86' is `Alpha' but next is `CET' in menu > gdb.texinfo:27280: warning: node prev pointer for `x86' is `AArch64' but prev is `GCS' in menu > gdb.texinfo:27321: warning: node `Alpha' is next for `CET' in menu but not in sectioning > gdb.texinfo:27321: warning: node `x86' is prev for `CET' in menu but not in sectioning > gdb.texinfo:27321: warning: node up pointer for `CET' is `x86' but up is `Architectures' in menu > gdb.texinfo:27362: warning: node prev pointer for `Alpha' is `x86' but prev is `CET' in menu > > for the menu changes: > ~~~ > @menu > * AArch64:: > +* GCS:: > * x86:: > +* CET:: > * Alpha:: > * MIPS:: > * HPPA:: > ~~~ Yes, because you are adding these items to the wrong menu. These nodes are NOT subsections of "Architectures", they are subsubsections of its subsections. So the @menu with these nodes should be in the parent subsections, not in "Architectures". > If I change the CET and GCS subsubsections to subsections the warning disappears... > so I think I must add a new @menu for the subsubsections. > > +@menu > +* CET:: > +@end menu Yes. > This avoids triggering a warning. However, since none of the other AArch64 or > x86 subsubsections currently have nodes, I believe we should add nodes for > them and update the menu accordingly: There's no need to add a node for each subsubsection. In fact, I'm not sure I understand why you wanted to add the two @node's that give you trouble, can you explain?