From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120983 invoked by alias); 26 May 2015 11:26:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 119927 invoked by uid 89); 26 May 2015 11:26:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f47.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.220.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:26:21 +0000 Received: by pacwv17 with SMTP id wv17so90673412pac.2 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.156.225 with SMTP id wh1mr49038020pab.100.1432639579600; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm12801227pdo.84.2015.05.26.04.26.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 04:26:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] New gdb.reverse test case for aarch64 instructions References: <1432041752-4638-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <1432041752-4638-5-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <555E3E7D.6010902@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <555E3E7D.6010902@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 21 May 2015 21:22:21 +0100") Message-ID: <86lhgbr356.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves writes: > Nice, this looks like something we could use in other archs too. Did you > consider putting that procedure in shared code? Yes, my plan is to rename gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/aarch64.exp to instruction-reverse.exp, and add some tests for arm instructions, in order to generalise it. Then, probably, gdb.reverse/i386-reverse.exp and gdb.reverse/i386-sse-reverse.exp may be merged into instruction-reverse.exp too. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)