From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id GgiTHWODk2hoUAUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:31:31 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=sX1/B9cX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 65EC31E100; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:31:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID, BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B6E1E091 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0553858C2C for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:31:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B0553858C2C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=sX1/B9cX Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CEFA3858CD1 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:30:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1CEFA3858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1CEFA3858CD1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754497859; cv=none; b=Rvg0o9zzoKvJw734uT048JFGDgEmafM6dBBGFpDWp43/OHU8YeJZlIHTVUdhLEeZdN0iu8cOzLalm5xmRTySgDsYOq2kO/6pzJalrR+hFIXuUkodmcBOuZJH5qXNYokMxt6Sh8LgN2TcjY4G4RCYhShZ0yl0blMvtzhcMXrDAyU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754497859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jOKtn/Qu2F3YFaylF2c2aKchh+o5ODpGrD6zjAACYPU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=WolhdbHrkwR/zhsj9R/Y6b4W+fth5J0+aGAFTeZwCXpwah+g4XsrMid9E8yxTFK15uTTuu2qW0gilfga3SWMZxEyTN7rUkFQKtZOJ2ijmAIuE3x56tuKBBcvAVIYyS0xCM+MGorJGrrZ52nJ0Tg0RpEUKrOJ+faU/kMyVPt6JIA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1CEFA3858CD1 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ujh2V-0008OD-Kh; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:30:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=AGw8H42yD1O7qXiefdcB89Lae6lrfxan766sIHbGJ5U=; b=sX1/B9cXYygs Y3oZG/PvN7LyTHORcfraXjHSdYsVGZ7Xt67REZ2azskrCASQNTnlvFG38+eJADsMNaEAQ3T0TRH3b F9IlfBjPchWibIY926prfhl5wmklIKZ6JujiJ3T3NOi8IwSjjAw6wPkaRb+AGNQh/GnhPq4Ky3nvS ECxSKwBePjOzKF+VayBG5wNi76AT8KVEJZl7/OL/Ihds/ykE9Rx5JoJhUWV5Fu02YM8kBWk0GA5OG 987CGK2Y9GrH5HaJMmpH5H0ZmtB91PDzffIAPBm4HQTLhI2aA9E7pHdyiMi9Gs8YttnlXI7KYVNBA HRL8SSZVPRTa5wgnIgpLzQ==; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 19:30:52 +0300 Message-Id: <86ldnws98j.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vincent Lefevre Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20250806160024.GD2248@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> (message from Vincent Lefevre on Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:00:24 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide papersize for refcard.dvi References: <20250806145304.GA48050@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <86tt2ksbwm.fsf@gnu.org> <20250806160024.GD2248@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:00:24 +0200 > From: Vincent Lefevre > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On 2025-08-06 18:33:13 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Thanks, but we need to bring some TeX and DVI expert on board. I > > wonder why GDB needs this whereas, for example, Emacs doesn't. Is > > there something fundamentally wrong with the GDB refcard? > > That's strange, because I get exactly the same issue with Emacs. How come? I regularly produce refcard.pdf for Emacs, and never saw any such problems. Do you perhaps have some unusual default definition of paper size?