From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46029 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2015 11:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 46015 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2015 11:11:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f176.google.com) (209.85.192.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:11:12 +0000 Received: by pdbdz6 with SMTP id dz6so9128283pdb.0 for ; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:11:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.70.59.41 with SMTP id w9mr16116502pdq.5.1436181069944; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm17888853pdk.74.2015.07.06.04.11.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Jul 2015 04:11:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 new branching date: Jun 29th, 2015 References: <20150601213709.GC2631@adacore.com> <20150615135805.GA28342@adacore.com> <86si96o8si.fsf@gmail.com> <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:18:39 -0700") Message-ID: <86k2udo81l.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker writes: > How about today? There was one pending item, but it got moved to > the "maybe" section of the 7.10 release TODO. So we should be good > to go. Yes, it is good to create branch soon, as there is no blocking issues. > > I was really hoping that the patch issuing a warning when a discrepancy > between objfile being loaded in memory and actual executable being > debug is detected would make it... I'm wondering where we are at with > this one! Do you have a link about these patches? According to your description here, I feel it is a useful feature, but not critical that we must include it in 7.10 release. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)