From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28961 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2017 11:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28930 invoked by uid 89); 4 Apr 2017 11:10:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-wr0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-wr0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-wr0-f181.google.com) (209.85.128.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:10:05 +0000 Received: by mail-wr0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k6so205193240wre.2 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 04:10:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qL5a/5l35/lGaXPqYdSq89TRNU82FRjR1g+zoOo0U/M=; b=HxLjghrmh23oj7TnTl5xM3+QsScszSACnZtHdABZ/849GyyjieH/JykIcOaCQSBgy8 6Jz+vBLGpiZPQAHxDMIksrWuDPVgnpwasUxq8xvrYLtUSKuj8Y5v+Da+c+wRKWpx7Tj/ W20oSngZlgL375Vv3PUOkirmitzKVQJkxkrCquvi72nIi0yqyeRhap/j1l9lryTgvFlj eJ4ClZB2k9sdKBTMmbWCZ/RaOEQcV7aFAQSwxjkA1dqcZQdPp3D08W78GyVYUt4pCBA8 9t4yOAw8IilllaTwN8iGCTZHanAujDraUzT2cvrROTILemyWlbSXQMc/xK2W2/R3so2D ATyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3QG2b8Ms50Or5mphn0JRD9rqD9H//J+SN8HpTL4IBdCE9i4AP1 IKDMNP49xeIzyg== X-Received: by 10.28.103.138 with SMTP id b132mr13902622wmc.79.1491304204203; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN ([194.214.185.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 81sm18045073wmj.9.2017.04.04.04.10.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Apr 2017 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] Add rvalue reference tests and NEWS entry References: <1489176286-27973-1-git-send-email-keiths@redhat.com> <1489176286-27973-12-git-send-email-keiths@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1489176286-27973-12-git-send-email-keiths@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:46 -0800") Message-ID: <86inmkzawm.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 Keith Seitz writes: Hi Keith, > +# Test lvalue vs rvalue function overloads > +setup_kfail "c++/15372" "*-*-*" > +gdb_test "print f (i)" "=3D 1" "lvalue reference overload" > + I got KPASS and FAIL in this test. On x86_64-linux (g++ 5.4.0) print f (i)^M $3 =3D 1^M (gdb) KPASS: gdb.cp/rvalue-ref-overload.exp: lvalue reference overload (PRMS c++/15372) > +gdb_test "print f (ci)" "=3D 2" "lvalue reference to const overload" > + print f (ci)^M Attempt to take address of value not located in memory.^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/rvalue-ref-overload.exp: lvalue reference to const overl= oad > +setup_kfail "c++/15372" "*-*-*" > +gdb_test "print f (3)" "=3D 3" "rvalue reference overload" They also exist in the test result on aarch64-linux and s390x-linux, https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/RHEL-s390x-m64/builds/3700/steps/te= st%20gdb/logs/stdio https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Ubuntu-AArch64-m64/builds/1666/step= s/test%20gdb/logs/stdio --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)