From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id MhOCMOWmk2gFawUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:03:01 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=HWvhb+zR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B15A91E100; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:03:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID, BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3D61E091 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:03:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC9A3858C66 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 19:03:00 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5CC9A3858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=HWvhb+zR Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3664E3858D21 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 19:02:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3664E3858D21 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3664E3858D21 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754506953; cv=none; b=YbnWWpn4Y7Ghg9kb31Jq4ZqVBlE96pQ3GTLZajjjUSyqQFHMZNqzq2SQsJES3V8xn4bktcP4UpoapHsPKVQzNAkgyqy0WRK76/heqa6zrZR/BE7SHAZ8hWeNuwdF2BbVmLZOaUaQWj5CTBo9N9jI0KkvTI/OMHD/SRTY0zpH6vo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1754506953; c=relaxed/simple; bh=twov2CPaq9sB8uK3uyb2yBdpxCGISKcsUZ4cZQqLnOY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=XpC/0X/4bnxwn+EioVBH8MT+vYIrPgoht/lFsu3DM0BETO7IX0MoYf1J8NowJfmPJgP+YzpiLT+wutCuM+E5gEdsyHbBNuUND1tedZBic8VUF/A4x1r+br5OeNZU1NiaAjds1WsZxaGGgde/HyEnv12wUTPS6TvOxdc9yqULNcE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3664E3858D21 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ujjPD-0004Zg-Ul; Wed, 06 Aug 2025 15:02:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=OifK3t5eqKFHKFEebMRQA6ROWtAaoDUK8aRHPl2ATFw=; b=HWvhb+zRWDYN hqSzfTo1JQ5yAx2i7grTBRppcSvVV/k2ysVffNU//Cd/5PsJkRYgQmptF8kjwqH94vm/l3A3mcOxv 3y3ddb5F7dgXzvuNh1UWvOQDzvlzZjieLYeBqegY6HB8Gwldsz8Ay7fVYNUPtc9QjWJY+1Jy5WZWr S54DnEkFikRxnkbJb/FGU6d832BfeQGpx1jt1cDP0aOxiwncR0f+ZaGIdtsBUnfmlPt0Cb0N+cIGl 6/so25PoekrjIqIQe7wBbY/78Otp2DmR1IvsLbdaxsEglJSekD4AmE2uztGjPdtZQgLXKmF3JzbNN KiPcgXD+YjVpt+jtbjBLrw==; Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:02:27 +0300 Message-Id: <86ikj0s27w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vincent Lefevre Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20250806164748.GY2576@qaa.vinc17.org> (message from Vincent Lefevre on Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:47:48 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide papersize for refcard.dvi References: <20250806145304.GA48050@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <86tt2ksbwm.fsf@gnu.org> <20250806160024.GD2248@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <86ldnws98j.fsf@gnu.org> <20250806164748.GY2576@qaa.vinc17.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:47:48 +0200 > From: Vincent Lefevre > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > On 2025-08-06 19:30:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 18:00:24 +0200 > > > From: Vincent Lefevre > > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > > > On 2025-08-06 18:33:13 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Thanks, but we need to bring some TeX and DVI expert on board. I > > > > wonder why GDB needs this whereas, for example, Emacs doesn't. Is > > > > there something fundamentally wrong with the GDB refcard? > > > > > > That's strange, because I get exactly the same issue with Emacs. > > > > How come? I regularly produce refcard.pdf for Emacs, and never saw > > any such problems. Do you perhaps have some unusual default > > definition of paper size? > > PDF is different from DVI. Doesn't PDF generation go through DVI? And if it doesn't, then why should we care about DVI nowadays? Anyway, I feel we should take this discussion to the Texinfo list, where we will find people who know about TeX and DVI much more than I do, and could give some useful advice.