From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id NakKG6YADmmQhikAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:22:30 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=kfzWQvH6; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 591351E04C; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:22:30 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671641E04C for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:22:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42D33858D35 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:22:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E42D33858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gnu.org header.i=@gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=kfzWQvH6 Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D65F33858D1E for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:21:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D65F33858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D65F33858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1762525315; cv=none; b=Q97zCUSzEJmKDURmgJ5sE4wEA7rWjBlzzK2SdgRf+Zb5ZvnzBdFTgsigWPYbCBFlFshmJzYNPsQykeSJ+lWu1IwoBPoRTQZ2t2lFDLj5RRq33VuNKgby6dv2weJ2V+zJLyXYx6xsild3Yc/wdDNEmhxAzxaAh1MKggWlN0Wzrio= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1762525315; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h2B5IWMlfkEpPMImvpOjKGP4Pf85A4tLMBD/kotAy/M=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject:MIME-version; b=G3gOMBILBclDG9xrb/MxNGtqNAfbPOo4/ZlhzATYuLGSDTRcCXtRFJKsvkYm0SEBw4c047KYIgNURh0d680gxocrO4V4XY9pGj0u8AN7Y065yyNIO10CIJ9/ZPlxvatKRrRyb8NDgdQsgVxHwvkdFyKJCQw7GgAdQrgN4KvbCk4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D65F33858D1E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vHNLf-0001fW-8G; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 09:21:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=WTLIaimWBFToDCvjGryJlLAwdn/OHFsQ1PpYRINwIsA=; b=kfzWQvH6TsDE9JIHCNw9 2bWCMJkPp3sjYS+nFqHl4CUp+zWr2nqIZBHatP1/VpzSaG67T2uXHj7+DqRPWZtw/ti3xiwjRZTfq FsNPIzS7lmyEmoXAzi9gcwUBgKTDOkpPorglmGdHy8HWS1iyllV6j//3IqLNRYIUDEWq/eGTCYG/8 rbSPA+IctUA+I2cKgA1mwospa04iYr3zoO7K1Srru6sz/Bs/bBRYr3cofiGmn34N8qDKcl+zXYEUq /miAoV1iDvpKORJ1xDRycLPu6ozn5olx8/dkKuXql2tAetPIYG2wilSrt3UStxbD7W5RyplTIknTq eaaA4rBf74uF+w==; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 16:21:27 +0200 Message-Id: <86frapapp4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Guinevere Larsen Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <54086583-2fb0-498b-85ea-ebcb7e66f806@redhat.com> (message from Guinevere Larsen on Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:24:15 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb: add warning when no native target is available References: <20251106194514.1857177-1-guinevere@redhat.com> <20251106194514.1857177-3-guinevere@redhat.com> <864ir6b7wh.fsf@gnu.org> <54086583-2fb0-498b-85ea-ebcb7e66f806@redhat.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 10:24:15 -0300 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Guinevere Larsen > > On 11/7/25 4:48 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Guinevere Larsen > >> Cc: Guinevere Larsen > >> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:45:14 -0300 > >> > >> + if (get_native_target () == nullptr) > >> + warning (_("No native target, only remote debugging is supported.\n" > >> + "Use \"%ps\" to check which architectures are supported."), > >> + styled_string (command_style.style (), "info architecture")); > > Would we also say "Native debugging is supported" in the opposite > > case? > > > > Thanks. > > > When you debug an inferior without connecting to a gdbserver, you are > doing native debugging, but I don't think it makes sense to warn the > user that native debugging is supported since that is the default > behavior of GDB, if that is what  you mean with this email. Then perhaps I don't understand the purpose of the patch. I thought it was part of showing the information about GDB at the start of a session. In that case, I think it's good to let user know that this GDB supports native debugging, and also tell them if it doesn't. Apologies if I misunderstood.